Richard M. Smith
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- General Health Professions
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Health
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Pam SmithMichael GraceyRandolph M. SpargoErnest HunterLawrence J. BeilinMoira McKinnonV. BurkeIan B. Puddey
- Topics
- Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers)Sodium Intake and Health (3 papers)Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Richard M. Smith
15 papers receiving 234 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 66
- General Health Professions 35
- Nutrition and Dietetics 35
- Health 33
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 33
Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Smith. The network helps show where Richard M. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Smith. Richard M. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reticent on Race: Promoting Constructive Discussions about Race in a College Classroom | 1 |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | An assessment of the composition and nutrient content of an Australian Aboriginal hunter-gatherer diet | 6 |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 |
About Richard M. Smith
Richard M. Smith is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Conservation and Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Sodium Intake and Health (3 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (33 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (35 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (66 citations). Richard M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Pam Smith, Michael Gracey, Randolph M. Spargo, Ernest Hunter, Lawrence J. Beilin, Moira McKinnon, V. Burke, Ian B. Puddey, Yun Zhao and Roger A. King. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Communications of the ACM and Preventive Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.