Early Human Development

5.2k papers and 130.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.2k papers published in Early Human Development in the last decades have received a total of 130.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Early Human Development usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (3.0k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.7k papers) and Epidemiology (669 papers) specifically the topics of Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (1.5k papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (1.3k papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (1.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Early Human Development are H.F.R. Prechtl, John Dobbing, Jean Sands, E Mulder, Patricia Howlin, Mijna Hadders‐Algra, Clare Gilbert, Gerard H. A. Visser, Johanna I.P. de Vries and Gerard H.A. Visser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Early Human Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Early Human Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Early Human Development.

Countries where authors publish in Early Human Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Early Human Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Early Human Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early Human Development more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025