Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice
Barriers and facilitators to online medical and nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from international students from low- and middle-income countries and their teaching staff
2021122 citationsWen Li, Robyn M. Gillies et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robyn M. Gillies
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robyn M. Gillies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robyn M. Gillies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robyn M. Gillies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robyn M. Gillies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robyn M. Gillies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robyn M. Gillies. The network helps show where Robyn M. Gillies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robyn M. Gillies
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robyn M. Gillies.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robyn M. Gillies based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robyn M. Gillies. Robyn M. Gillies is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Manathunga, Catherine, et al.. (2018). The Hidden Lacunae in the Ethiopian Higher Education Quality Imperatives: Stakeholders' Views and Commentaries. USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast). 14(1). 75–94.3 indexed citations
10.
Gillies, Robyn M., et al.. (2016). The Effectiveness of a Guided Inquiry-Based, Teachers' Professional Development Programme on Saudi Students' Understanding of Density.. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 27(1). 16–39.41 indexed citations
11.
Gillies, Robyn M., et al.. (2015). Nurturing Cooperative Learning Pedagogies in Higher Education Classrooms: Evidence of Instructional Reform and Potential Challenges. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.36 indexed citations
12.
Pham, Thanh, Robyn M. Gillies, & Peter Renshaw. (2011). Designing Strategies to Make Cooperative Learning Culturally Appropriate in the Vietnamese Context.. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 44(1). 43–57.4 indexed citations
Gillies, Robyn M. & A. F. Ashman. (1994). The effects on students of structured cooperative learning. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).1 indexed citations
20.
Gillies, Robyn M.. (1993). Action research for school counselors. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 41(2). 69–72.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.