Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Collaborative manufacturing with physical human–robot interaction
2016422 citationsAndrea Cherubini, Robin Passama et al.Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Robin Passama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robin Passama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robin Passama more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robin Passama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robin Passama. The network helps show where Robin Passama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robin Passama
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robin Passama.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robin Passama based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robin Passama. Robin Passama is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cherubini, Andrea, Robin Passama, André Crosnier, Antoine Lasnier, & Philippe Fraisse. (2016). Collaborative manufacturing with physical human–robot interaction. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 40. 1–13.422 indexed citations breakdown →
Passama, Robin, et al.. (2012). Upgrading the ContrACT Scheduler with Useful Mechanisms for Dependability of Real-Time Systems. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
Lapierre, L., et al.. (2010). Reliability Improvement in Control Architecture for Mobile Robots: Implementation using COTAMA. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
14.
Lapierre, L., et al.. (2010). Using Adaptive Control Architecture to Enhance Mobile Robot Reliability. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 54–61.2 indexed citations
Royer, Jean-Claude, et al.. (2007). Components with Symbolic Transition Systems: A Java Implementation of Rendez-Vous. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).2 indexed citations
17.
Passama, Robin, et al.. (2005). Component based Software Architecture of Robot Controllers. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).3 indexed citations
18.
Passama, Robin, et al.. (2002). J-NetObject : Un Noyau d'Exécution de Réseaux de Petri à Objets Temporels. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).3 indexed citations
19.
Andreu, David, et al.. (2002). Manuel d'Utilisation E-NetObject : Un Editeur de Réseaux de Petri à Objets. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
20.
Andreu, David, et al.. (2002). E-NetObject: Un Editeur de Réseaux de Petri à Objets. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.