Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Interpreting the French Revolution
1982275 citationsPaul H. Beik, François Furet et al.The American Historical Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Elborg Forster
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elborg Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elborg Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elborg Forster more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elborg Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elborg Forster. The network helps show where Elborg Forster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elborg Forster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elborg Forster.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elborg Forster based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elborg Forster. Elborg Forster is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Orlow, Dietrich, Hans Mommsen, Elborg Forster, & Larry Eugene Jones. (1997). The Rise and Fall of Weimar Democracy.. The American Historical Review. 102(5). 1513–1513.22 indexed citations
Furet, François & Elborg Forster. (1990). A Commentary. French Historical Studies. 16(4). 792–792.1 indexed citations
10.
Forster, Elborg, et al.. (1984). A woman's life in the court of the Sun King : letters of Liselotte von der Pfalz, Elisabeth Charlotte, Duchesse d'Orléans, 1652-1722. Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
11.
Wachtel, Nathan & Elborg Forster. (1982). The MITIMAS of the Cochabamba Valley: the colonization policy of Huayna Capac. 199–235.25 indexed citations
12.
Beik, Paul H., François Furet, & Elborg Forster. (1982). Interpreting the French Revolution. The American Historical Review. 87(4). 1103–1103.275 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Forster, Robert, Orest Ranum, Elborg Forster, & Patricia M. Ranum. (1979). Food and drink in history : selections from the Annales, économies, sociétes, civilisations, volume 5. Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
Förster, Robert, Orest Ranum, Elborg Forster, & Patricia M. Ranum. (1978). Family and Society.. Population and Development Review. 4(2). 357–357.111 indexed citations
16.
Forster, Robert, Orest Ranum, Elborg Forster, & Patricia M. Ranum. (1977). Rural society in France : selections from the Annales : économies, sociétés, civilisations. Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
17.
Forster, Elborg & Robert Förster. (1975). European diet from pre-industrial to modern times. Medical Entomology and Zoology.40 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.