Population Studies

3.5k papers and 69.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in Population Studies in the last decades have received a total of 69.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Population Studies usually cover Demography (1.0k papers), Gender Studies (987 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (781 papers) specifically the topics of Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (748 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (486 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (448 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Population Studies are Samuel H. Preston, John C. Caldwell, John Bongaarts, Dudley Kirk, Mónica Das Gupta, Øystein Kravdal, Larry L. Bumpass, John G.F. Cleland, Kathleen Kiernan and Gordon F. De Jong.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Population Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Population Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Population Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Population Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Population Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Population Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Population Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025