Peter Remnant

1.3k citations
14 papers · 419 indexed · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Historical Philosophy and Science
    • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy

Papers in

    • Historical Philosophy and Science 3
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 2
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 1
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 1

Peter Remnant

13 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Peter Remnant
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • History and Philosophy of Science 185
  • Philosophy 222
  • Theoretical Computer Science 14
  • General Psychology 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 114
Replace Robert Stoothoff with:
Robert Stoothoff United Kingdom
Willis Doney United Kingdom
Ruth Mattern United States
Wolfgang Schwarz United Kingdom
Benson Mates United States
David Pears United Kingdom
Lewis E. Hahn United States
Horace Μ. Κallen United States
Donald C. Williams United States
Fred Wilson Canada
Peter Remnant relative to Robert Stoothoff United Kingdom Robert Stoothoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert Stoothoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Remnant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Remnant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Remnant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Remnant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Remnant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Remnant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Remnant. The network helps show where Peter Remnant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Remnant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Remnant Line = papers co-authored together Peter Remnant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Peter Remnant

Peter Remnant is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper) and Space exploration and regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (185 citations), Philosophy (222 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (14 citations), General Psychology (12 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (114 citations). Peter Remnant has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Jonathan Bennett, Ruth Mattern, Jonathan Bennett, Benson Mates, Nicholas Jolley, Edwin Curley and Robert L. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Mind, Analysis, The Philosophical Review and Noûs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026