Hans Hermes
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 2%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 5
-
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms 5
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 2
- Co-authors
- Friedrich KambartelGottlob FregeFriedrich KaulbachMartin DavisRobert StoothoffGottfried GabrielRoger M. WhiteEike‐Henner W. Kluge
- Journals
- Journal of Symbolic Logic (5 papers)The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Lecture notes in mathematics (2 papers)Archive for Mathematical Logic (1 paper)Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Hans Hermes
31 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Theoretical Computer Science 50
- History and Philosophy of Science 118
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 127
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 151
- Philosophy 76
Countries citing papers authored by Hans Hermes
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Hermes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Hermes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Hermes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Hermes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Hermes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Hermes. The network helps show where Hans Hermes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Hans Hermes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 30 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 38 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 40 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1972 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1971 | 41 | |
| 9 | 1970 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1970 | 3 | |
| 11 | Mathesis universalis : Abhandlungen zur Philosophie als strenger Wissenschaft | 1969 | 8 |
| 12 | 1969 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1968 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1967 | 20 | |
| 15 | 1966 | 27 | |
| 16 | 1965 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1961 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1956 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1955 | 31 |
About Hans Hermes
Hans Hermes is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Religious studies, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (5 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (5 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers), Families in Therapy and Culture (1 paper), Corporate Governance and Law (1 paper), Philosophy and Historical Thought (1 paper) and Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (50 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (118 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (151 citations) and Philosophy (76 citations). Hans Hermes has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Friedrich Kambartel, Gottlob Frege, Friedrich Kaulbach, Martin Davis, Robert Stoothoff, Gottfried Gabriel, Roger M. White, Eike‐Henner W. Kluge, Christian Thiel and Joan Weiner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, The Philosophical Review, Lecture notes in mathematics, Archive for Mathematical Logic and Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.