Ignacio Angelelli
- Philosophy top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers)Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of PhilosophyPhilosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ignacio Angelelli
16 papers receiving 164 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Philosophy 94
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
- History and Philosophy of Science 55
- Artificial Intelligence 25
- Sociology and Political Science 14
Countries citing papers authored by Ignacio Angelelli
This map shows the geographic impact of Ignacio Angelelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignacio Angelelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignacio Angelelli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ignacio Angelelli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignacio Angelelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignacio Angelelli. The network helps show where Ignacio Angelelli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ignacio Angelelli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ignacio Angelelli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ignacio Angelelli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ignacio Angelelli. Ignacio Angelelli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Studies on the History of Logic: Proceedings of the III. Symposium on the History of Logic | 7 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Abstraction and number in Michael Dummett's Frege: Philosophy of mathematics | 0 |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze | 26 |
About Ignacio Angelelli
Ignacio Angelelli is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (14 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (55 citations) and Philosophy (94 citations). Ignacio Angelelli has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gottlob Frege, Jorge J. E. Gracia, J. E. Llewelyn, Robert Stoothoff and Hans Sluga. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.