Robert Phillips

48 papers receiving 710 citations

Peers

Robert Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Computer Science Applications 88
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Human-Computer Interaction 70
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 95
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 60
Replace Jungjoo Kim with:
Jungjoo Kim South Korea
Francis United Kingdom
Leilei Zhao China
Daniel Jensen United States
Johanna Silvennoinen Finland
Justin R. Chimka United States
Jeff Terpstra United States
Qing Ma China
David Ison United States
Robert Phillips relative to Jungjoo Kim South Korea Jungjoo Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Jungjoo Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Phillips. The network helps show where Robert Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Robert Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201078
2 200266
3 201166
4 201058
5 200056
6 201941
7 201138
8 199833
9 200331
10 202125
11
Dialogue Act Modeling in a Complex Task-Oriented Domain
201024
12
An Affect-Enriched Dialogue Act Classification Model for Task-Oriented Dialogue
201120
13 200919
14 201419
15 200918
16 199017
17 200817
18 200916
19 201415
20 201014

About Robert Phillips

Robert Phillips is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, Management of Technology and Innovation, Computer Science Applications and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (14 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (11 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (9 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (8 papers), Topic Modeling (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (88 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (70 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (95 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (60 citations). Robert Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, Ronalds González, Mladen A. Vouk, Hasan Jameel, James C. Lester, Michael D. Wallis, Daniel Saloni, Robert Abt, Jeff Wright and Bart Van Gheluwe. Their work appears in journals such as Biomass and Bioenergy, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Sustainability, Healthcare and Gut.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact