Robert Maninger

502 total citations
9 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

Robert Maninger is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Maninger has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Robert Maninger's work include Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). Robert Maninger is often cited by papers focused on Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). Robert Maninger collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert Maninger's co-authors include Susan E. Anderson, Jonathan Gratch, Daniel Powell and Janet Kelly and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Computing Research, TechTrends and American secondary education.

In The Last Decade

Robert Maninger

7 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert Maninger United States	5	270	147	121	49	47	9	335
Rivka Wadmany Israel	6	353 1.3×	124 0.8×	135 1.1×	45 0.9×	26 0.6×	17	432
John F. Bauer United States	5	271 1.0×	104 0.7×	78 0.6×	38 0.8×	19 0.4×	9	332
Ayoub Kafyulilo Tanzania	8	293 1.1×	62 0.4×	142 1.2×	41 0.8×	29 0.6×	26	380
Lawrence Lanahan	4	222 0.8×	114 0.8×	48 0.4×	42 0.9×	23 0.5×	6	283
Gürkay Birinci Türkiye	3	196 0.7×	62 0.4×	99 0.8×	30 0.6×	57 1.2×	5	346
Sönmez Pamuk Türkiye	7	394 1.5×	102 0.7×	160 1.3×	69 1.4×	15 0.3×	11	474
Michael J. Nelson United States	8	222 0.8×	74 0.5×	162 1.3×	28 0.6×	15 0.3×	14	332
Clif Mims United States	4	297 1.1×	90 0.6×	233 1.9×	73 1.5×	21 0.4×	6	431
Kari Sormunen Finland	5	195 0.7×	58 0.4×	103 0.9×	43 0.9×	40 0.9×	16	259
Henryk R. Marcinkiewicz United States	7	245 0.9×	178 1.2×	51 0.4×	59 1.2×	66 1.4×	18	317

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Maninger

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Maninger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Maninger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Maninger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Maninger

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Maninger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Maninger. The network helps show where Robert Maninger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Maninger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Maninger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Maninger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Maninger. Robert Maninger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Maninger, Robert, et al.. (2015). The Use of Twitter in the Creation of Educational Professional Learning Opportunities. 5(1). 16 indexed citations

2.

Anderson, Susan E., et al.. (2012). Modeling the Relationship between Preservice Teachers' Beliefs and Intentions Regarding Technology Integration. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2012(1). 1634–1639. 1 indexed citations

3.

Anderson, Susan E., et al.. (2011). Relationships among Preservice Teachers' Technology-Related Abilities, Beliefs, and Intentions to Use Technology in Their Future Classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 45(3). 321–338. 97 indexed citations

4.

Maninger, Robert, et al.. (2009). Put the Textbooks Away: Preparation and Support for a Middle School One-to-One Laptop Initiative. American secondary education. 38(1). 5–33. 20 indexed citations

5.

Kelly, Janet, et al.. (2007). A Reflective Discourse on Science Learning and the Merits of Simulation. 42(3-4). 23–23. 3 indexed citations

6.

Anderson, Susan E. & Robert Maninger. (2007). Preservice Teachers' Abilities, Beliefs, and Intentions regarding Technology Integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 37(2). 151–172. 189 indexed citations

7.

Maninger, Robert & Daniel Powell. (2007). The Lincoln Middle School Paradigm Shift. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership. 10(1). 22–31. 1 indexed citations

8.

Maninger, Robert. (2006). Successful Technology Integration: Student Test Scores Improved in an English Literature Course through the Use of Supportive Devices. 50(5). 37–45. 3 indexed citations

9.

Maninger, Robert. (2006). Student Test Scores Improved in an English Literature Course through the Use of Supportive Devices. TechTrends. 50(5). 37–45. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact