Robert K. Rittenhouse

597 total citations
25 papers, 436 citations indexed

About

Robert K. Rittenhouse is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert K. Rittenhouse has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 436 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Robert K. Rittenhouse's work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (17 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers) and Education Practices and Challenges (3 papers). Robert K. Rittenhouse is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Impairment and Communication (17 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers) and Education Practices and Challenges (3 papers). Robert K. Rittenhouse collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert K. Rittenhouse's co-authors include Jacob J. Feldman, Penny Mohr, Jennifer L. Dunbar, Margaret W. Skinner, John K. Niparko, Asghar Iran‐Nejad, Andrew Ortony, Rand J. Spiro, Karl R. White and Lenore Shisler and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders and International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

In The Last Decade

Robert K. Rittenhouse

23 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert K. Rittenhouse United States 8 216 178 173 80 69 25 436
Julia M. Davis United States 10 442 2.0× 418 2.3× 201 1.2× 74 0.9× 39 0.6× 14 658
Robert L. Schum United States 7 249 1.2× 238 1.3× 138 0.8× 46 0.6× 24 0.3× 16 421
Dimity Dornan Australia 9 369 1.7× 252 1.4× 164 0.9× 83 1.0× 22 0.3× 16 497
Carol Flexer United States 16 410 1.9× 345 1.9× 155 0.9× 168 2.1× 41 0.6× 46 703
Merle Mahon United Kingdom 15 284 1.3× 291 1.6× 133 0.8× 76 0.9× 79 1.1× 38 583
Yung‐Ting Tsou Netherlands 11 192 0.9× 97 0.5× 115 0.7× 41 0.5× 29 0.4× 34 309
Laura Button Australia 11 433 2.0× 344 1.9× 201 1.2× 94 1.2× 13 0.2× 14 582
Gary W. Mauk United States 11 301 1.4× 96 0.5× 301 1.7× 46 0.6× 17 0.2× 25 527
Kerstin Möller Sweden 11 176 0.8× 107 0.6× 115 0.7× 39 0.5× 8 0.1× 22 347
Sanna Hou Australia 13 489 2.3× 250 1.4× 316 1.8× 125 1.6× 15 0.2× 23 595

Countries citing papers authored by Robert K. Rittenhouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert K. Rittenhouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert K. Rittenhouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert K. Rittenhouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert K. Rittenhouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert K. Rittenhouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert K. Rittenhouse. The network helps show where Robert K. Rittenhouse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert K. Rittenhouse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert K. Rittenhouse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert K. Rittenhouse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert K. Rittenhouse. Robert K. Rittenhouse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mohr, Penny, Jacob J. Feldman, Jennifer L. Dunbar, et al.. (2000). THE SOCIETAL COSTS OF SEVERE TO PROFOUND HEARING LOSS IN THE UNITED STATES. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 16(4). 1120–1135. 300 indexed citations
2.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1999). Identification of Gifted Deaf Children: A Complex but Critical Educational Process. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 89(1). 219–221. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1995). Gifted Students with Hearing Impairments Suggestions for Teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children. 27(4). 51–53.
4.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1994). Auditory Specialization in Deaf Children: Aural and Cognitive Interactions. American annals of the deaf. 139(2a). 80–85. 2 indexed citations
5.
Rittenhouse, Robert K.. (1993). A Technological Teaching Tool: Interactive Video Systems.. 12(1). 2–6. 1 indexed citations
6.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1991). Building Vocabulary Tools for Reading.. 10(2). 16–19. 1 indexed citations
7.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1991). Conservation and Metaphor Acquisition in Hearing-Impaired Children: Some Relationships With Communication Mode, Hearing Acuity, Schooling, and Age. American annals of the deaf. 136(4). 313–320. 6 indexed citations
8.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1991). The Black and Deaf Movements in America Since 1960: Parallelism and an Agenda for the Future. American annals of the deaf. 136(5). 392–400. 5 indexed citations
9.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1990). Real-Time Graphic Display: Technology for Mainstreaming. 9(2). 2–5. 2 indexed citations
10.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1990). Teaching Idiomatic Expressions: A Comparison of Two Instructional Methods. American annals of the deaf. 135(4). 322–326. 9 indexed citations
11.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1990). Figurative language and reading comprehension in American deaf and hard‐of‐hearing children: Textual interactions. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 25(3). 369–374. 6 indexed citations
12.
13.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1989). Educational Interpreter Services for Hearing-Impaired Students: Provider and Consumer Disagreements.. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 22(3). 8. 2 indexed citations
14.
Rittenhouse, Robert K.. (1987). The Attitudes of Deaf and Normal Hearing High Schoolers toward School, Each Other and Themselves: Mainstreamed and Self-Contained Comparisons.. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 21(1). 8. 3 indexed citations
15.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1982). Teaching Metaphor to Deaf Children. American annals of the deaf. 127(1). 12–17. 5 indexed citations
16.
17.
Iran‐Nejad, Asghar, Andrew Ortony, & Robert K. Rittenhouse. (1981). The Comprehension of Metaphorical Uses of English by Deaf Children. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 24(4). 551–556. 32 indexed citations
18.
Rittenhouse, Robert K. & Rand J. Spiro. (1979). Conservation Performance in Day and Residential School Deaf Children.. The Volta Review. 81(7). 7 indexed citations
19.
Rittenhouse, Robert K. & Rand J. Spiro. (1979). Conservation in Deaf and Normal-Hearing Children.. 1 indexed citations
20.
Rittenhouse, Robert K., et al.. (1978). 8 Task Analysis for Teaching Practical Signs to Deaf-Blind Individuals. Teaching Exceptional Children. 10(2). 34–37. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026