Robert G. Wagner

4.0k citations
117 papers · 3.3k indexed · h-index 35

Robert G. Wagner

113 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Robert G. Wagner
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.3k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.9k
  • Insect Science 834
  • Ecology 651
  • Plant Science 527
Replace Magnus Löf with:
Magnus Löf Sweden
Chadwick Dearing Oliver United States
Catherine Collet France
Jacques Baudry France
Palle Madsen Denmark
Dominik Hessenmöller Germany
Christopher D. Philipson Switzerland
Peter Brang Switzerland
Petra Lasch‐Born Germany
Stephen R. Shifley United States
Robert G. Wagner relative to Magnus Löf Sweden Magnus Löf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Magnus Löf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Wagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Wagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Wagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Wagner. The network helps show where Robert G. Wagner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert G. Wagner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert G. Wagner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert G. Wagner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert G. Wagner. Robert G. Wagner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 17
3 1
4 2
5 33
6 27
7 12
8 14
9 9
10
Regeneration Strategies of Japanese Barberry (Berberis thunbergii DC.) in Coastal Forests of Maine
6
11
Top 10 principles for managing competing vegetation to maximize regeneration success and long-term yields.
1
12
TB186: Assessing Silviculture Research Priorities for Maine Using Wood Supply Analysis
10
13 37
14 43
15 19
16 10
17 16
18
Timing and duration of herbaceous vegetation control around four northern coniferous species
12
19 33
20 1

About Robert G. Wagner

Robert G. Wagner is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Insect Science, having authored 117 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (59 papers), Forest Management and Policy (43 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (42 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.3k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.9k citations) and Insect Science (834 citations). Robert G. Wagner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Steven R. Radosevich, Michael T. Ter‐Mikaelian, Aaron R. Weiskittel, R. A. Lautenschlager, Frederick W. Bell, Michael R. Saunders, Keith M. Little, Thomas L. Noland, B. Richardson and Ken McNabb. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Ecology, Ecological Applications and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026