Emily S. Huff

529 total citations
35 papers, 380 citations indexed

About

Emily S. Huff is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily S. Huff has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 380 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 11 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Emily S. Huff's work include Forest Management and Policy (21 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (11 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (10 papers). Emily S. Huff is often cited by papers focused on Forest Management and Policy (21 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (11 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (10 papers). Emily S. Huff collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Malawi. Emily S. Huff's co-authors include Stephanie A. Snyder, Kristin Floress, Brett J. Butler, Sarah Butler, Marissa F. McBride, Kathleen F. Lambert, Jonathan R. Thompson, Patrick Field, Shorna B. Allred and Jessica Leahy and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Landscape and Urban Planning.

In The Last Decade

Emily S. Huff

33 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Emily S. Huff

GPC

HTM

ACS

GABS

Rajan Parajuli United States

Pham Van Ha Australia

Kathryn G. Arano United States

Richard Yao New Zealand

Torgny Lind Sweden

Franz Josef Schmithüsen Switzerland

Cathal O. Donoghue Ireland

Marcel Riedl Czechia

Norbert Weber Germany

Stjepan Posavec Croatia

Rajan Parajuli United States

Emily S. Huff

307 ×1.1

GPC

189 ×1.9

26 ×0.5

HTM

24 ×0.6

ACS

41 ×1.2

GABS

Citations per year, relative to Emily S. Huff Emily S. Huff (= 1×) peers Rajan Parajuli

Countries citing papers authored by Emily S. Huff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily S. Huff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily S. Huff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily S. Huff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily S. Huff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily S. Huff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily S. Huff. The network helps show where Emily S. Huff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily S. Huff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily S. Huff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily S. Huff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily S. Huff. Emily S. Huff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Wagner, Robert G., A. L. Friend, Emily S. Huff, et al.. (2025). New Approach Needed To Address Declining Forestry Research Capacity And Relevancy in the US: A Call-To-Action. Journal of Forestry. 123(5). 511–521.

Huff, Emily S., et al.. (2024). Analysis of location, feedstock availability, and economic impacts of potential mass timber processing facilities in Michigan. Forest Policy and Economics. 163. 103203–103203. 7 indexed citations

Bunting, Erin, et al.. (2024). Mapping and Measuring Environmental Justice: A Case Study of Bioenergy Development in Michigan, USA. Environmental Justice. 18(2). 117–127. 2 indexed citations

Frankel, Susan J., et al.. (2024). Perceptions of Tree Diseases in Indigenous Communities: Native Alaskan and Hawaiian Insights. Journal of Forestry. 122(2). 123–130. 2 indexed citations

Huff, Emily S., et al.. (2023). Attitudes and perceptions of wood energy technologies in the Great Lakes region, USA. Biomass and Bioenergy. 176. 106897–106897.

Perry, Elizabeth E., et al.. (2023). Local Climate Action Planning toward Larger Impact: Enhancing a Park System's Contributions by Examining Regional Efforts. 16(1). 64–82. 5 indexed citations

Butler, Brett J., et al.. (2023). Trends in United States Family Forest Owners’ Attitudes, Behaviors, and General Characteristics from 2006 to 2018. Forest Science. 69(6). 689–697. 11 indexed citations

Norris, Patricia E., et al.. (2023). Assessing the wood-basket and characterizing Michigan's logging businesses by their reliance on nonindustrial private forests for stumpage. Forest Policy and Economics. 156. 103067–103067. 3 indexed citations

Huff, Emily S., et al.. (2022). Family forest owner perceptions of wildfire and invasive pest risk: The role of interpersonally-produced risks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 83. 103417–103417. 4 indexed citations

10.

Удпа, Лалита, et al.. (2022). A Microwave Tomography System Using Time-Reversal Imaging for Forestry Applications. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(4). 614–625. 2 indexed citations

11.

Leahy, Jessica, et al.. (2021). Industry Leaders’ Perceptions of Residential Wood Pellet Technology Diffusion in the Northeastern U.S.. Sustainability. 13(8). 4178–4178. 1 indexed citations

12.

Huff, Emily S., Michelle Johnson, Lara A. Roman, et al.. (2020). A Literature Review of Resilience in Urban Forestry. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 46(3). 185–196. 21 indexed citations

13.

Harper, Richard W., et al.. (2020). Employing qualitative research interviews to understand urban forestry stakeholder continuing education needs. Arboricultural Journal. 42(2). 65–75. 3 indexed citations

14.

Floress, Kristin, et al.. (2019). Public perceptions of county, state, and national forest management in Wisconsin, USA. Forest Policy and Economics. 104. 110–120. 7 indexed citations

15.

Huff, Emily S., et al.. (2018). Foreign investments in the forestry sector as a means of increasing community resilience: two case studies in Mexico. The International Forestry Review. 20(4). 452–468. 4 indexed citations

16.

Harper, Richard W., et al.. (2018). Exploring the characteristics of successful volunteer-led urban forest tree committees in Massachusetts. Urban forestry & urban greening. 34. 311–317. 22 indexed citations

17.

Leahy, Jessica, et al.. (2018). A Social Network Analysis of a Regional Automated Wood Pellet Heating Industry in Pursuing Homeowner Satisfaction. Forest Products Journal. 68(2). 182–190. 2 indexed citations

18.

Huff, Emily S.. (2017). A National Perspective on Women Owning Woodlands (WOW) Networks. Journal of Extension. 55(2). 18 indexed citations

19.

McBride, Marissa F., et al.. (2017). Increasing the effectiveness of participatory scenario development through codesign. Ecology and Society. 22(3). 63 indexed citations

20.

Huff, Emily S., Jessica Leahy, David E. Hiebeler, Aaron R. Weiskittel, & Caroline L. Noblet. (2015). An Agent-Based Model of Private Woodland Owner Management Behavior Using Social Interactions, Information Flow, and Peer-To-Peer Networks. PLoS ONE. 10(11). e0142453–e0142453. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact