William C. Parker

4.0k total citations
126 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

William C. Parker is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, William C. Parker has authored 126 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 41 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 21 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in William C. Parker's work include Forest ecology and management (31 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (26 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (23 papers). William C. Parker is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (31 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (26 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (23 papers). William C. Parker collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Venezuela. William C. Parker's co-authors include Stephen G. Pallardy, Daniel C. Dey, Andrée E. Morneault, N. Getoff, Thomas L. Noland, Douglas G. Pitt, S. J. Colombo, Steven G. Newmaster, Thomas M. Hinckley and Robert O. Teskey and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Ecology and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.

In The Last Decade

William C. Parker

121 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William C. Parker Canada 28 1.0k 980 642 332 247 126 2.2k
Peter A. Becker United States 31 1.0k 1.0× 884 0.9× 529 0.8× 520 1.6× 340 1.4× 105 3.0k
Benoît Côté Canada 28 446 0.4× 517 0.5× 257 0.4× 330 1.0× 228 0.9× 108 2.1k
J. W. Wilson Australia 23 607 0.6× 343 0.3× 1.2k 1.8× 251 0.8× 558 2.3× 100 2.2k
Giustino Tonon Italy 28 596 0.6× 523 0.5× 941 1.5× 198 0.6× 596 2.4× 114 3.3k
N. Davidson Australia 25 632 0.6× 683 0.7× 558 0.9× 87 0.3× 478 1.9× 93 2.0k
Zhenzhu Xu China 42 1.6k 1.6× 521 0.5× 3.0k 4.7× 522 1.6× 583 2.4× 234 7.4k
Nathalie Frascaria‐Lacoste France 31 247 0.2× 474 0.5× 748 1.2× 91 0.3× 643 2.6× 133 3.2k
John A. Small United States 21 220 0.2× 475 0.5× 737 1.1× 106 0.3× 325 1.3× 57 2.0k
J. Waterhouse United Kingdom 27 1.7k 1.7× 269 0.3× 503 0.8× 1.9k 5.6× 318 1.3× 72 2.9k
Tetsuya Matsui Japan 24 408 0.4× 655 0.7× 390 0.6× 131 0.4× 412 1.7× 124 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Parker. The network helps show where William C. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Parker. William C. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Messier, Christian, et al.. (2025). Young temperate tree species show fine root trait acclimation to differences in water availability. Plant and Soil. 518(1). 1011–1034.
2.
Lu, Pengxin, Jean Beaulieu, John Pedlar, et al.. (2024). Assessing assisted population migration (seed transfer) for eastern white pine at northern planting sites. Forest Ecology and Management. 572. 122309–122309. 2 indexed citations
3.
Parker, William C., et al.. (2023). Tree-ring growth varies with climate and stand density in a red pine plantation forest in the Great Lakes region of North America. Dendrochronologia. 79. 126091–126091. 2 indexed citations
4.
Handa, I. Tanya, et al.. (2023). Young temperate tree species show different fine root acclimation capacity to growing season water availability. Plant and Soil. 496(1-2). 485–504. 5 indexed citations
5.
Fahey, Catherine, William C. Parker, Alain Paquette, Christian Messier, & Pedro M. Antunes. (2023). Soil fungal communities contribute to the positive diversity–productivity relationship of tree communities under contrasting water availability. Journal of Ecology. 111(9). 2023–2037. 3 indexed citations
6.
Cook‐Patton, Susan C., Owen T. Lewis, Nick Brown, et al.. (2023). Young mixed planted forests store more carbon than monocultures—a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 6. 29 indexed citations
7.
Maxwell, Tania L., Nicolas Fanin, William C. Parker, et al.. (2022). Tree species identity drives nutrient use efficiency in young mixed‐species plantations, at both high and low water availability. Functional Ecology. 36(8). 2069–2083. 5 indexed citations
8.
Belluau, Michaël, Valentina Vitali, William C. Parker, Alain Paquette, & Christian Messier. (2021). Overyielding in young tree communities does not support the stress‐gradient hypothesis and is favoured by functional diversity and higher water availability. Journal of Ecology. 109(4). 1790–1803. 27 indexed citations
9.
10.
Cruz, J. Virgílio, S.W. Jr. Wise, William C. Parker, & J. R. Young. (2019). Distribution of NE Gulf of Mexico nannoplankton assemblages following the Macondo Well blowout: August–November 2011–2013.. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. S4. 39–54.
11.
Parker, William C., et al.. (2018). Irrigation after Laparoscopic Power Morcellation and the Dispersal of Leiomyoma Cells: A Pilot Study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 25(7). S7–S8. 2 indexed citations
12.
Landing, William M., et al.. (2010). Atmospheric wet deposition of mercury and other trace elements in Pensacola, Florida. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 10(10). 4867–4877. 42 indexed citations
13.
Parker, William C. & Daniel C. Dey. (2008). Influence of overstory density on ecophysiology of red oak (Quercus rubra) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum) seedlings in central Ontario shelterwoods. Tree Physiology. 28(5). 797–804. 48 indexed citations
14.
Parker, William C. & Stephen G. Pallardy. (1987). The influence of resaturation method and tissue type on pressure-volume analysis of Quercus alba L. seedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany. 38(188). 535–549. 59 indexed citations
15.
Ragland, Paul C., et al.. (1986). Diagenesis of Jurassic Smackover Formation, Jay field, Florida. AAPG Bulletin. 36. 1 indexed citations
16.
Parker, William C., et al.. (1983). Statistical Determination of Mean Strike and Dip: An Example from the Basal Tuscaloosa, Eastern Alabama. AAPG Bulletin. 33. 1 indexed citations
17.
Parker, William C., et al.. (1979). Possible Role of Volatile Fatty Acids and Abscisic Acid in the Dormancy of Oats. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 63(4). 758–764. 35 indexed citations
18.
Berrie, A. M. M., et al.. (1967). Induction of Light Sensitive Dormancy in Seed of Lactuca sativa L. (Lettuce) by Patulin. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 42(6). 889–890. 5 indexed citations
19.
Getoff, N. & William C. Parker. (1963). SEPARATION OF RADIOACTIVE IODINE IN HIGH PURITY FORM FROM RADIOACTIVE TELLURIUM BY MEANS OF COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY.
20.
Parker, William C., et al.. (1960). Thin film thickness distribution by alpha absorption. Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 7(2). 160–166. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter A. Becker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Benoît Côté Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. W. Wilson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Giustino Tonon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. Davidson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Zhenzhu Xu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nathalie Frascaria‐Lacoste Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John A. Small Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Waterhouse Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tetsuya Matsui
Rankless by CCL
2026