William C. Parker
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen G. PallardyDaniel C. DeyAndrée E. MorneaultN. GetoffThomas L. NolandDouglas G. PittS. J. ColomboSteven G. Newmaster
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (31 papers)Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (26 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (23 papers)
- Journals
- NatureEcologyPLANT PHYSIOLOGY
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesVenezuela
In The Last Decade
William C. Parker
121 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Global and Planetary Change 1.0k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 980
- Plant Science 642
- Atmospheric Science 332
- Ecology 247
Countries citing papers authored by William C. Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Parker. The network helps show where William C. Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Parker. William C. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | The influence of resaturation method and tissue type on pressure-volume analysis of Quercus alba L. seedlings | 59 |
| 15 | Diagenesis of Jurassic Smackover Formation, Jay field, Florida | 1 |
| 16 | Statistical Determination of Mean Strike and Dip: An Example from the Basal Tuscaloosa, Eastern Alabama | 1 |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | SEPARATION OF RADIOACTIVE IODINE IN HIGH PURITY FORM FROM RADIOACTIVE TELLURIUM BY MEANS OF COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY | 0 |
| 20 | 8 |
About William C. Parker
William C. Parker is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Radiation and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 126 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (31 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (26 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (980 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.0k citations) and Radiation (178 citations). William C. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Venezuela. Frequent co-authors include Stephen G. Pallardy, Daniel C. Dey, Andrée E. Morneault, N. Getoff, Thomas L. Noland, Douglas G. Pitt, S. J. Colombo, Steven G. Newmaster, Thomas M. Hinckley and Robert O. Teskey. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Ecology and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.