Douglas G. Pitt
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Dean G. ThompsonFrederick W. BellAndrée E. MorneaultWilliam C. ParkerRobert G. WagnerPhilip G. ComeauMurray WoodsR. A. Lautenschlager
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (20 papers)Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (15 papers)Fire effects on ecosystems (11 papers)
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and ManagementEcotoxicology and Environmental SafetyCanadian Journal of Forest Research
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSerbia
In The Last Decade
Douglas G. Pitt
37 papers receiving 676 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 534
- Global and Planetary Change 399
- Insect Science 256
- Environmental Engineering 144
- Ecology 133
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas G. Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas G. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas G. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas G. Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas G. Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas G. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas G. Pitt. The network helps show where Douglas G. Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas G. Pitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas G. Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas G. Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas G. Pitt. Douglas G. Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Douglas G. Pitt
Douglas G. Pitt is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 37 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (20 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (15 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (534 citations), Insect Science (256 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (399 citations). Douglas G. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Dean G. Thompson, Frederick W. Bell, Andrée E. Morneault, William C. Parker, Robert G. Wagner, Philip G. Comeau, Murray Woods, R. A. Lautenschlager, Chris R. Hennigar and David A. MacLean. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.