Robert E. Lane

75 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Robert E. Lane
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Communication 248
  • Political Science and International Relations 772
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.4k
  • General Decision Sciences 57
  • Safety Research 221
Replace Karl‐Dieter Opp with:
Karl‐Dieter Opp Germany
Richard Ned Lebow United States
James R. Kluegel United States
Gregory B. Markus United States
Greg A. Caldeira
Kristen Renwick Monroe United States
Stanford M. Lyman United States
Alex Inkeles United States
Lionel S. Lewis United States
Jennifer L. Hochschild United States
Robert E. Lane relative to Karl‐Dieter Opp Germany Karl‐Dieter Opp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Karl‐Dieter Opp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Lane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Lane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Lane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Lane. The network helps show where Robert E. Lane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Lane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Lane Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Lane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991300
2 1964184
3 1998182
4 1959167
5 1963148
6 1977125
7 1986119
8
Political Life: Why and How People Get Involved in Politics
1965115
9 1966106
10 1995101
11 195984
12 195574
13 195971
14 199471
15 201452
16 198840
17 199439
18 201538
19 197036
20 200035

About Robert E. Lane

Robert E. Lane is a scholar working on General Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (6 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (248 citations), Political Science and International Relations (772 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations), General Decision Sciences (57 citations) and Safety Research (221 citations). Robert E. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Lerner, William Kornhauser, Conrad Joyner, Martin O’Connor, Regina Miranda, Michael Hechter, Lynn Nadel, Richard E. Michod, Fred I. Greenstein and Jane Mansbridge. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Sociological Review, Political Psychology, Political Theory and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026