Elise Paul
- Health top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Modeling and Simulation top 1%
- Co-authors
- Daisy FancourtAndrew SteptoeFeifei BuJohn EckenrodeJanis WhitlockAliona TsypesMeg FluhartyJill Sonke
- Topics
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (11 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Elise Paul
43 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Health 909
- Clinical Psychology 530
- Infectious Diseases 453
- Sociology and Political Science 405
- Modeling and Simulation 232
Countries citing papers authored by Elise Paul
This map shows the geographic impact of Elise Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elise Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elise Paul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elise Paul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elise Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elise Paul. The network helps show where Elise Paul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elise Paul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elise Paul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elise Paul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elise Paul. Elise Paul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 66 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communicationsbreakdown → | 705 |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 119 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Elise Paul
Elise Paul is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Conservation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (11 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (909 citations), Modeling and Simulation (232 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (43 citations). Elise Paul has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Daisy Fancourt, Andrew Steptoe, Feifei Bu, John Eckenrode, Janis Whitlock, Aliona Tsypes, Meg Fluharty, Jill Sonke, Jessica K. Bone and Ana Ortin‐Peralta. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.