Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Haskell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Haskell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Haskell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Haskell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Haskell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Haskell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Haskell. The network helps show where Robert E. Haskell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert E. Haskell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert E. Haskell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert E. Haskell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert E. Haskell. Robert E. Haskell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Haskell, Robert E.. (2004). A logico-mathematic, structural methodology: Part III, theoretical, evidential, and corroborative bases of a new cognitive unconscious for sub-literal (SubLit) cognition and language. The Journal of mind and behavior. 25(4). 287–322.3 indexed citations
3.
Haskell, Robert E.. (2003). A logico-mathematic, structural methodology. Part I: The analysis and validation of sub-literal (SubLit) language and cognition. The Journal of mind and behavior. 24. 347–400.7 indexed citations
Haskell, Robert E.. (1997). Academic Freedom, Promotion, Reappointment, Tenure and the Administrative Use of Student Evaluation of Faculty (SEF): (Part IV) Analysis and Implications of Views from the Court in Relation to Academic Freedom, Standards, and Quality Instruction.. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 5(21).11 indexed citations
8.
Haskell, Robert E.. (1997). Academic Freedom, Promotion, Reappointment, Tenure and the Administrative Use of Student Evaluation of Faculty: (Part II) Views from the Court.. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 5(17).3 indexed citations
9.
Haskell, Robert E.. (1997). Academic Freedom, Promotion, Reappointment, Tenure and the Administrative Use of Student Evaluation of Faculty (SEF): (Part III) Analysis and Implications of Views from the Court in Relation to Accuracy and Psychometric Validity.. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 5(18).10 indexed citations
10.
Haskell, Robert E.. (1997). Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Student Evaluation of Faculty: Galloping Polls in the 21st Century.. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 5(6).77 indexed citations
Haskell, Robert E.. (1986). Cognitive psychology and dream research: Historical, conceptual, and epistemological considerations. The Journal of mind and behavior. 7.11 indexed citations
Haskell, Robert E.. (1975). Temporomandibular Joint Function and Dysfunction II. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 68(9). 599–599.2 indexed citations
20.
Haskell, Robert E.. (1968). Anatomy of Analogy: A New Look. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 8(2). 161–169.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.