Amy Coenen

1.2k total citations
64 papers, 847 citations indexed

About

Amy Coenen is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy Coenen has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 847 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 17 papers in Molecular Biology and 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Amy Coenen's work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (44 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (17 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (11 papers). Amy Coenen is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (44 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (17 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (11 papers). Amy Coenen collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Amy Coenen's co-authors include Nicholas R. Hardiker, Ardith Z. Doorenbos, Sarah A. Wilson, Judith J. Warren, Patricia Abbott, Suzanne Bakken, Heimar F. Marin, Mary Jane Schank, Darlene Weis and Karen Dorman Marek and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

In The Last Decade

Amy Coenen

63 papers receiving 794 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy Coenen United States 19 446 251 216 200 199 64 847
Karen S. Martin United States 14 373 0.8× 193 0.8× 149 0.7× 66 0.3× 386 1.9× 46 760
Norma M. Lang United States 14 342 0.8× 179 0.7× 104 0.5× 57 0.3× 323 1.6× 47 640
Jeungok Choi United States 15 73 0.2× 101 0.4× 85 0.4× 14 0.1× 352 1.8× 42 653
Ingrid Thorell‐Ekstrand Sweden 10 302 0.7× 141 0.6× 152 0.7× 16 0.1× 292 1.5× 19 562
Heljä Lundgrén‐Laine Finland 11 52 0.1× 56 0.2× 63 0.3× 37 0.2× 95 0.5× 29 396
Yul Ha Min South Korea 14 37 0.1× 46 0.2× 91 0.4× 33 0.2× 246 1.2× 40 535
Jean Nagelkerk United States 10 42 0.1× 68 0.3× 124 0.6× 12 0.1× 280 1.4× 27 606
Susan Bostwick United States 12 22 0.0× 169 0.7× 122 0.6× 31 0.2× 159 0.8× 22 588
Kyungmi Woo South Korea 13 37 0.1× 46 0.2× 89 0.4× 12 0.1× 163 0.8× 44 391
Sheila Corcoran United States 9 180 0.4× 100 0.4× 82 0.4× 8 0.0× 182 0.9× 15 457

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Coenen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Coenen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Coenen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Coenen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Coenen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Coenen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Coenen. The network helps show where Amy Coenen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Coenen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Coenen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Coenen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Coenen. Amy Coenen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Choi, Jeeyae, et al.. (2017). Modeling a Nursing Guideline with Standard Terminology and Unified Modeling Language for a Nursing Decision Support System: A Case Study.. PubMed. 2015. 426–33. 3 indexed citations
2.
Marek, Karen Dorman, et al.. (2016). Identifying Care Coordination Interventions Provided to Community-Dwelling Older Adults Using Electronic Health Records. CIN Computers Informatics Nursing. 34(7). 303–311. 2 indexed citations
3.
Hübner, Ursula, Kaija Saranto, Amy Coenen, & Joyce Sensmeier. (2013). eNursing Summary – Where Global Standardisation and Regional Practice Meet. 1236–1236. 2 indexed citations
4.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (2011). Toward harmonising WHO International Classifications: a nursing perspective. Informatics for Health and Social Care. 36(1). 35–49. 15 indexed citations
5.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (2011). Semantic mappings and locality of nursing diagnostic concepts in UMLS. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 45(1). 93–100. 22 indexed citations
6.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (2010). A quality improvement model for healthcare terminologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 43(6). 1036–1043. 14 indexed citations
7.
Abbott, Patricia & Amy Coenen. (2008). Globalization and advances in information and communication technologies: The impact on nursing and health. Nursing Outlook. 56(5). 238–246.e2. 41 indexed citations
8.
Heilman, Kenneth M., Amy Coenen, & Benzi M. Kluger. (2008). Progressive Asymmetric Apraxic Agraphia. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 21(1). 14–17. 15 indexed citations
9.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (2006). Changes in the ICNP Version 1.0 from Beta 2.. PubMed. 122. 503–4. 2 indexed citations
10.
Hardiker, Nicholas R. & Amy Coenen. (2006). A formal foundation for ICNP.. PubMed. 122. 705–9. 4 indexed citations
11.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (2006). Participation in the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) programme.. PubMed. 124. 157–61. 1 indexed citations
12.
Doorenbos, Ardith Z., Sarah A. Wilson, Amy Coenen, & Nagesh N. Borse. (2006). Dignified dying: phenomenon and actions among nurses in India. International Nursing Review. 53(1). 28–33. 29 indexed citations
13.
Doorenbos, Ardith Z., Sarah A. Wilson, & Amy Coenen. (2006). A Cross‐Cultural Analysis of Dignified Dying. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 38(4). 352–357. 13 indexed citations
14.
Goossen, William, Judy G. Ozbolt, Amy Coenen, et al.. (2004). Development of a Provisional Domain Model for the Nursing Process for Use within the Health Level 7 Reference Information Model. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 11(3). 186–194. 28 indexed citations
15.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (1999). Describing Parish Nurse Practice Using the Nursing Minimum Data Set. Public Health Nursing. 16(6). 412–416. 24 indexed citations
16.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (1998). Nursing Diagnosis in the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP). International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 9(3). 111–118. 5 indexed citations
17.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (1998). Nursing Diagnosis in the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP). International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 9(4). 111–118. 2 indexed citations
18.
Warren, Judith J. & Amy Coenen. (1998). International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP): Most-frequently Asked Questions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 5(4). 335–336. 36 indexed citations
19.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (1997). Mapping Nursing Interventions From a Hospital Information System to the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 8(4). 145–151. 20 indexed citations
20.
Coenen, Amy, et al.. (1995). Use of the Nursing Minimum Data Set to Describe Nursing Interventions for Select Nursing Diagnoses and Related Factors in an Acute Care Setting. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 6(3). 108–114. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen S. Martin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Norma M. Lang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeungok Choi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ingrid Thorell‐Ekstrand Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heljä Lundgrén‐Laine Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yul Ha Min Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jean Nagelkerk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susan Bostwick Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kyungmi Woo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sheila Corcoran
Rankless by CCL
2026