Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Three Schools of CCO Thinking
2014136 citationsDennis Schoeneborn, Steffen Blaschke et al.Management Communication Quarterlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. McPhee
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. McPhee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. McPhee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. McPhee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. McPhee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. McPhee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. McPhee. The network helps show where Robert D. McPhee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert D. McPhee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert D. McPhee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert D. McPhee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert D. McPhee. Robert D. McPhee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dudgeon, Pat, et al.. (2018). Indigenous governance for suicide prevention in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities: A guide for Primary Health Networks. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA).3 indexed citations
3.
McPhee, Robert D.. (2015). Agency and the Four Flows. Management Communication Quarterly. 29(3). 487–492.7 indexed citations
4.
Schoeneborn, Dennis, Steffen Blaschke, François Cooren, et al.. (2014). The Three Schools of CCO Thinking. Management Communication Quarterly. 28(2). 285–316.136 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
McPhee, Robert D., Steven R. Corman, & Joel O. Iverson. (2013). “We ought to have … gumption …”: A cra analysis of an excerpt from the videotape corporation: After Mr. Sam. 131–162.1 indexed citations
6.
Myers, Karen K. & Robert D. McPhee. (2006). Group Influence on Member Assimilation in Highly Interdependent Workgroups: A Multilevel Analysis. 1–46.
Walker, Roz, et al.. (2000). Critical Reflections for professional development. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 311–324.7 indexed citations
11.
McPhee, Robert D. & David R. Seibold. (1999). Responses to the Finalist Essays. Management Communication Quarterly. 13(2). 327–336.5 indexed citations
McPhee, Robert D.. (1975). Derivation and Test of a New Model of Message-Attitude-Behavior Relations..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.