R.J. Bino
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Plant Science top 0.2%
- Biochemistry top 0.2%
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Food Science top 1%
- Co-authors
- Robert D. HallRic C. H. de VosSofia MocoC. H. Ric De VosArjen LommenJacques VervoortArnaud BovyJoost J. B. Keurentjes
- Topics
- Seed Germination and Physiology (38 papers)Plant tissue culture and regeneration (37 papers)Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (21 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
R.J. Bino
112 papers receiving 7.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Molecular Biology 5.1k
- Plant Science 4.2k
- Biochemistry 967
- Spectroscopy 828
- Food Science 679
Countries citing papers authored by R.J. Bino
This map shows the geographic impact of R.J. Bino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.J. Bino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.J. Bino more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R.J. Bino
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.J. Bino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.J. Bino. The network helps show where R.J. Bino may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.J. Bino
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.J. Bino. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.J. Bino based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R.J. Bino. R.J. Bino is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 175 | |
| 3 | 162 | |
| 4 | 161 | |
| 5 | 280 | |
| 6 | Untargeted large-scale plant metabolomics using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometrybreakdown → | 740 |
| 7 | 363 | |
| 8 | 64 | |
| 9 | 175 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics toolbreakdown → | 507 |
| 12 | A controlled deterioration test for Arabidopsis thaliana reveals genetic variation in seed quality | 60 |
| 13 | 70 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | Evaluation of mechanical damage in seeds of maize (Zea mays L.) by X-ray and digital imaging | 44 |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | Effects of ageing and osmopriming on germination characteristics and chromosome aberrations of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seeds | 9 |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About R.J. Bino
R.J. Bino is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biochemistry and Physiology, having authored 112 papers that have together received 8.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seed Germination and Physiology (38 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (37 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (967 citations), Plant Science (4.2k citations) and Molecular Biology (5.1k citations). R.J. Bino has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Hall, Ric C. H. de Vos, Sofia Moco, C. H. Ric De Vos, Arjen Lommen, Jacques Vervoort, Arnaud Bovy, Joost J. B. Keurentjes, H. A. Verhoeven and S.P.C. Groot. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Genetics, The Plant Cell and Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.