Hans‐Peter Mock
Impact in
- Plant Science top 0.1%
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Papers in
- Plant Science 110
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 31
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 23
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 16
- Biochemistry 12
- Co-authors
- Andrea MatrosBernhard GrimmElisabeth KruseSilke PeterekCathie MartinJutta PapenbrockStephanie KasparEugenio Butelli
- Journals
- Planta (11 papers)The Plant Journal (10 papers)Frontiers in Plant Science (9 papers)PROTEOMICS (7 papers)Phytochemistry (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Hans‐Peter Mock
177 papers receiving 8.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Plant Science 5.9k
- Biochemistry 842
- Molecular Biology 4.9k
- Biotechnology 418
- Food Science 742
Countries citing papers authored by Hans‐Peter Mock
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans‐Peter Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans‐Peter Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans‐Peter Mock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans‐Peter Mock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans‐Peter Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans‐Peter Mock. The network helps show where Hans‐Peter Mock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hans‐Peter Mock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 133 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 11 | Proteomic analysis of cold acclimation in winter wheat under field conditions | 2014 | 12 |
| 12 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 162 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 316 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 92 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 47 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 123 |
About Hans‐Peter Mock
Hans‐Peter Mock is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Food Science and Spectroscopy, having authored 177 papers that have together received 9.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (43 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (31 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (23 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (23 papers), Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (19 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (17 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (16 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (5.9k citations), Biochemistry (842 citations), Molecular Biology (4.9k citations), Biotechnology (418 citations) and Food Science (742 citations). Hans‐Peter Mock has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Matros, Bernhard Grimm, Elisabeth Kruse, Silke Peterek, Cathie Martin, Jutta Papenbrock, Stephanie Kaspar, Eugenio Butelli, Marco Giorgio and Katja Witzel. Their work appears in journals such as Planta, The Plant Journal, Frontiers in Plant Science, PROTEOMICS and Phytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.