Richard Parker
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Louis ReaBrian McKinstryJohn CampbellMelissa Orlandin PremaorJuliet CompstonWilliam M. BennettSimon NortonRobert T. Curtis
- Topics
- Finite Group Theory Research (10 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (7 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of Internal Medicine
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Richard Parker
183 papers receiving 5.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
- General Health Professions 1.0k
- Surgery 878
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 724
- Neurology 575
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 475
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Parker. The network helps show where Richard Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Parker. Richard Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | Alcohol Brief Interventions for male remand prisoners: Protocol for a complex intervention framework development and feasibility study | 1 |
| 15 | 101 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Richard Parker
Richard Parker is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Family Practice, having authored 194 papers that have together received 6.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Finite Group Theory Research (10 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (7 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (354 citations), General Health Professions (1.0k citations) and Applied Psychology (201 citations). Richard Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Louis Rea, Brian McKinstry, John Campbell, Melissa Orlandin Premaor, Juliet Compston, William M. Bennett, Simon Norton, Robert T. Curtis, Rebecca Wilson and R. Steinberg. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Annals of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.