Mahesh Parmar

58.1k total citations · 16 hit papers
299 papers, 27.0k citations indexed

About

Mahesh Parmar is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Statistics and Probability and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mahesh Parmar has authored 299 papers receiving a total of 27.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 107 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 84 papers in Statistics and Probability and 70 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Mahesh Parmar's work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (82 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (59 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (40 papers). Mahesh Parmar is often cited by papers focused on Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (82 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (59 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (40 papers). Mahesh Parmar collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Mahesh Parmar's co-authors include Lesley Stewart, Valter Torri, Patrick Royston, Richard Stephens, Matthew R. Sydes, Laurence S. Freedman, David J. Spiegelhalter, Richard Kaplan, Stanley Dische and A Harvey and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Nature Medicine and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Mahesh Parmar

288 papers receiving 26.3k citations

Hit Papers

Extracting summary statis... 1993 2026 2004 2015 1998 2017 2002 2009 2003 1000 2.0k 3.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mahesh Parmar United Kingdom 71 11.0k 8.3k 6.7k 2.8k 2.6k 299 27.0k
Marc Buyse Belgium 80 7.7k 0.7× 15.5k 1.9× 4.9k 0.7× 1.7k 0.6× 2.9k 1.1× 404 29.0k
Eric J. Feuer United States 68 11.0k 1.0× 17.9k 2.1× 5.8k 0.9× 2.3k 0.8× 910 0.3× 252 40.4k
Larry Rubinstein United States 54 20.2k 1.8× 22.4k 2.7× 7.3k 1.1× 7.4k 2.6× 1.9k 0.7× 196 47.6k
Deborah Schrag United States 96 9.1k 0.8× 19.8k 2.4× 7.8k 1.2× 1.9k 0.7× 835 0.3× 439 38.7k
Lori E. Dodd United States 28 9.5k 0.9× 11.4k 1.4× 4.2k 0.6× 4.4k 1.6× 698 0.3× 72 24.2k
Val Gebski Australia 67 7.1k 0.6× 7.7k 0.9× 7.0k 1.0× 1.1k 0.4× 412 0.2× 470 20.5k
Laurence Collette Belgium 79 15.2k 1.4× 12.7k 1.5× 11.3k 1.7× 3.0k 1.1× 858 0.3× 317 31.6k
Michael W. Kattan United States 121 31.6k 2.9× 9.4k 1.1× 11.3k 1.7× 5.0k 1.8× 2.9k 1.1× 807 52.8k
Richard Kaplan United Kingdom 48 20.2k 1.8× 22.4k 2.7× 7.8k 1.2× 7.5k 2.7× 893 0.3× 173 46.0k
Patrick C. Walsh United States 104 29.5k 2.7× 3.9k 0.5× 8.0k 1.2× 1.9k 0.7× 1.2k 0.4× 577 40.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Mahesh Parmar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mahesh Parmar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mahesh Parmar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mahesh Parmar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mahesh Parmar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mahesh Parmar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mahesh Parmar. The network helps show where Mahesh Parmar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mahesh Parmar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mahesh Parmar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mahesh Parmar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mahesh Parmar. Mahesh Parmar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
4.
Parmar, Mahesh, et al.. (2023). A Comparative Analysis for Filter-Based Feature Selection Techniques with Tree-based Classification. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication. 11(10s). 360–369.
6.
Parmar, Mahesh, et al.. (2023). Sentiment Analysis Using Deep Neural Network 1D Convolutional with Long Short Term Memory. 7. 1–5. 1 indexed citations
7.
Tunis, Sean, Mahesh Parmar, Howard A. Burris, Michelle M. LeBeau, & Larry G. Kessler. (2023). Approaches and data needed for real-world evaluation of multicancer early detection tests.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 41(16_suppl). e15069–e15069. 1 indexed citations
8.
Limkin, Elaine Johanna, Pierre Blanchard, Benjamin Lacas, et al.. (2023). Season of radiotherapy and outcomes of head & neck cancer patients in the MACH-NC & MARCH meta-analyses. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 190. 110011–110011. 1 indexed citations
10.
Li, Vivien, Baptiste Leurent, Frederik Barkhof, et al.. (2022). Designing Multi-arm Multistage Adaptive Trials for Neuroprotection in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology. 98(18). 754–764. 12 indexed citations
11.
Vergote, Ignace, Corneel Coens, Matthew Nankivell, et al.. (2019). Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Debulking Surgery in Advanced Tubo-Ovarian Cancers: Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS Trials. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 74(3). 156–158. 30 indexed citations
12.
Blyuss, Oleg, Matthew Burnell, Andy Ryan, et al.. (2018). Comparison of Longitudinal CA125 Algorithms as a First-Line Screen for Ovarian Cancer in the General Population. Clinical Cancer Research. 24(19). 4726–4733. 39 indexed citations
13.
Mulvenna, P., Matthew Nankivell, Rachael Barton, et al.. (2016). Dexamethasone and supportive care with or without whole brain radiotherapy in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases unsuitable for resection or stereotactic radiotherapy (QUARTZ): results from a phase 3, non-inferiority, randomised trial. The Lancet. 388(10055). 2004–2014. 453 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Burnell, Matthew, Catherine A. Cox, Andy Ryan, et al.. (2014). Association of skirt size and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in older women: a cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). BMJ Open. 4(9). e005400–e005400. 6 indexed citations
15.
Royston, Patrick & Mahesh Parmar. (2013). Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 13(1). 152–152. 623 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Hatton, M., Matthew Nankivell, Stephen Falk, et al.. (2010). Induction Chemotherapy and Continuous Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) for Patients With Locally Advanced Inoperable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The MRC INCH Randomized Trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 81(3). 712–718. 26 indexed citations
17.
Menon, Usha, Matthew Burnell, Aarti Sharma, et al.. (2007). Decline in use of hormone therapy among postmenopausal women in the United Kingdom. Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. 14(3). 462–467. 38 indexed citations
19.
Grant, Adrian, D. G. Altman, Abdel Babiker, et al.. (2005). Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials. Health Technology Assessment. 9(7). 1–238, iii. 205 indexed citations
20.
Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti, Adriana Bermúdez, Anne Floquet, et al.. (2003). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 21 randomised trials. UCL Discovery (University College London). 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026