Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
THE SPECTRUM OF THYROID DISEASE IN A COMMUNITY: THE WHICKHAM SURVEY
19771.8k citationsW. M. G. Tunbridge, D C Evered et al.profile →
Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction
1985725 citationsDavid I. Perrett, Pam Smith et al.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciencesprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Smith. The network helps show where Pam Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pam Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pam Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pam Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pam Smith. Pam Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Holloway, Aisha, Jennifer Ferguson, Dorothy Newbury‐Birch, et al.. (2017). Alcohol Brief Interventions for male remand prisoners: Protocol for a complex intervention framework development and feasibility study. BMJ Open.1 indexed citations
Pate, F. Donald, et al.. (2004). Historic Sites and Landscapes: Brownhill Creek Catchment and Waite Reserve. Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University).1 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Richard M. & Pam Smith. (2003). An assessment of the composition and nutrient content of an Australian Aboriginal hunter-gatherer diet. Australian aboriginal studies. 2003(2). 39–52.6 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Pam. (2002). 'Gwion Gwion: Secret and Sacred Pathways of the Ngarinytn Aboriginal People of Australia', by Ngarjno, Ungudman, Banggal and Nyawarra; edited by Jeff Doring [Book Review]. Australian Archaeology. 53–54.2 indexed citations
Smith, Pam & Amy Roberts. (2001). Report on the Native Title and Archaeology Workshop, Adelaide, South Australia. Australian Archaeology. 52(52). 72–72.
13.
Smith, Pam. (2001). Station camps: The ethnoarchaeology of cultural change in the post-contact period in the south-east Kimberley region of Western Australia. Australian Archaeology. 65–66.2 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Pam, et al.. (1999). Streeter's Jetty, Broome, Western Australia: How a heritage icon moved from private ownership to community control.. 17. 116–120.2 indexed citations
15.
Perrett, David I., Pam Smith, Douglas D. Potter, et al.. (1985). Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 223(1232). 293–317.725 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.