Christopher J. Weir
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Papers in
-
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 27
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 20
- Co-authors
- Kennedy R. LeesGordon MurrayPeter LanghorneKeith W. MuirMatthew R. WaltersAlexander DykerStella AslanyanScott Muir
- Journals
- Stroke (22 papers)BMJ Open (19 papers)Trials (6 papers)PLoS ONE (5 papers)Pharmaceutical Statistics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. Weir
211 papers receiving 7.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
- Rehabilitation 1.1k
- Neurology 1.4k
- Epidemiology 2.9k
- Internal Medicine 266
- Statistics and Probability 533
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Weir
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Weir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Weir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Weir. The network helps show where Christopher J. Weir may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher J. Weir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 20 | STROKE SCORING SYSTEMS - REPLY | 1994 | 1 |
About Christopher J. Weir
Christopher J. Weir is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Rehabilitation, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Neurology, having authored 220 papers that have together received 8.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (45 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (27 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (23 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (20 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (20 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (18 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (12 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (1.1k citations), Neurology (1.4k citations), Epidemiology (2.9k citations), Internal Medicine (266 citations) and Statistics and Probability (533 citations). Christopher J. Weir has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kennedy R. Lees, Gordon Murray, Peter Langhorne, Keith W. Muir, Matthew R. Walters, Alexander Dyker, Stella Aslanyan, Scott Muir, Lindsay Govan and Markku Kaste. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, BMJ Open, Trials, PLoS ONE and Pharmaceutical Statistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.