Richard E. Groop

564 citations
19 papers · 445 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Richard E. Groop

18 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Richard E. Groop
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Ecological Modeling 80
  • Global and Planetary Change 129
  • Geography, Planning and Development 33
  • Transportation 30
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 54
Replace Howard W. Harshaw with:
Howard W. Harshaw Canada
Alexis Morgan Canada
K. D. Cocks Australia
Catherine Leyshon United Kingdom
Perry J. Brown United States
Kelly de Bie Australia
Azadeh Karimi Iran
Jennifer I. Schmidt United States
Mark Groulx Canada
Jean-Paul Cheylan France
Richard E. Groop relative to Howard W. Harshaw Canada Howard W. Harshaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Howard W. Harshaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Groop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Groop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Groop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Groop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Groop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Groop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Groop. The network helps show where Richard E. Groop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Groop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Groop Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Groop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1999160
2
Population, Land Use, and Environment: Research Directions
2005106
3 200036
4 200627
5 197820
6 199715
7 200713
8 199013
9 199611
10 198811
11 199010
12 198110
13 19823
14 19993
15 19852
16 19782
17
MATRIX LINE PRINTER MAPS.
19821
18 19891
19 20001

About Richard E. Groop

Richard E. Groop is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Geography, Planning and Development, Automotive Engineering and Urban Studies, having authored 19 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis (3 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (3 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (2 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (80 citations), Global and Planetary Change (129 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (33 citations), Transportation (30 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (54 citations). Richard E. Groop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jianguo Liu, Zhiyun Ouyang, William W. Taylor, Heming Zhang, Yingchun Tan, Scott Bearer, Jiaguo Qi, Xiaohong Chen, An Li and Randall J. Schaetzl. Their work appears in journals such as The Professional Geographer, Journal of Geography, International Journal of Health Geographics, Conservation Biology and The Social Science Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact