Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions among Different Research Studies
1971350 citationsRichard L. Light et al.Harvard Educational Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard L. Light
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard L. Light's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard L. Light with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard L. Light more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard L. Light
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard L. Light. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard L. Light. The network helps show where Richard L. Light may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard L. Light
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard L. Light.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard L. Light based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard L. Light. Richard L. Light is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jarrett, Kendall & Richard L. Light. (2017). In-service teachers’ experiences of using game based approaches to teach games: Implications for physical education teacher educators. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).2 indexed citations
4.
Light, Richard L.. (2016). Positive Pedagogy for Sport Coaching: Athlete-centred coaching for individual sports.5 indexed citations
5.
Light, Richard L. & Stephen Harvey. (2015). Positive Pedagogy for sport coaching. Sport Education and Society. 22(2). 271–287.89 indexed citations
6.
Light, Richard L.. (2014). Mushin and learning in and beyond budo. 14(3). 42–48.3 indexed citations
Light, Richard L.. (2003). The joy of learning: emotion and learning in games through TGfU.. 36(1). 93–108.50 indexed citations
12.
Centra, John A., Richard L. Light, J. David Singer, & John B. Willett. (1991). By Design: Planning Research on Higher Education.. The Journal of Higher Education. 62(3). 359–359.146 indexed citations
Light, Richard L.. (1979). Children's Linguistic Attitudes: A Study and Some Implications.. Language Arts. 56(2).1 indexed citations
15.
Light, Richard L.. (1978). Development of Children's Attitudes toward Speakers of Standard and Non-Standard English.. Child study journal. 8(4).5 indexed citations
16.
Light, Richard L., et al.. (1974). Preliminary Error Analysis: Russians Using English..4 indexed citations
17.
Light, Richard L.. (1971). Some Observations Concerning Black Children's Conversations.. 21(4).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.