P. Christopher Smith
- Philosophy top 2%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 5
- Philosophy and Historical Thought 4
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 3
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 1
- Anthropology top 10%
-
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy 7
-
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 1
-
- Theatre and Performance Studies 1
- Architecture and Art History Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Hans‐Georg GadamerI. M. CrombieWillis Goth RegierLawrence P. SchrenkRichard L. LightMargarita SuñerRuby BlondellDebra Nails
- Journals
- Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology (2 papers)Industrial Law Journal (1 paper)The Classical World (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
P. Christopher Smith
19 papers receiving 206 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Philosophy 145
- History and Philosophy of Science 18
- Anthropology 33
- Linguistics and Language 15
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
Countries citing papers authored by P. Christopher Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of P. Christopher Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Christopher Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Christopher Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P. Christopher Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Christopher Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Christopher Smith. The network helps show where P. Christopher Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 20 scholars most cited alongside P. Christopher Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 3 | Who Speaks for Plato?: Studies in Platonic Anonymity | 2000 | 24 |
| 4 | 2000 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 6 | Ship arrest handbook | 1997 | 0 |
| 7 | Tradition and Experimentation: Mexico City Theatre, Summer 1989 | 1990 | 0 |
| 8 | 1988 | 40 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 70 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1980 | 53 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1978 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1971 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1969 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1962 | 1 |
About P. Christopher Smith
P. Christopher Smith is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 31 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (4 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (3 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (1 paper), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (1 paper), Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper) and Architecture and Art History Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (145 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations) and Anthropology (33 citations). P. Christopher Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Georg Gadamer, I. M. Crombie, Willis Goth Regier, Lawrence P. Schrenk, Richard L. Light, Margarita Suñer, Ruby Blondell, Debra Nails, Lloyd P. Gerson and Holger Thesleff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Industrial Law Journal, The Classical World, Harvard Educational Review and The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.