Richard L. Fullerton

1.2k citations
7 papers · 755 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 7

Richard L. Fullerton

7 papers receiving 702 citations

Hit Papers

Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in Colleg...3352009202620142020100200300

Peers

Richard L. Fullerton
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Safety Research 304
  • General Decision Sciences 39
  • Management Science and Operations Research 256
  • Computer Science Applications 69
  • Economics and Econometrics 257
Replace Christine Harbring with:
Christine Harbring Germany
Pablo Casas‐Arce United States
Matthias Kräkel Germany
Oliver Gürtler Germany
F. Asís Martínez-Jerez United States
Francis Tapon Canada
Michael G. Bowen United States
Elliott Fan Taiwan
Kenneth C. Williams United States
Christian Grund Germany
Richard L. Fullerton relative to Christine Harbring Germany Christine Harbring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Christine Harbring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard L. Fullerton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard L. Fullerton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard L. Fullerton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard L. Fullerton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard L. Fullerton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard L. Fullerton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard L. Fullerton. The network helps show where Richard L. Fullerton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Richard L. Fullerton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard L. Fullerton Line = papers co-authored together Richard L. Fullerton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievementbreakdown →
2009335
2
Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement. NBER Working Paper No. 14032.
20089
3 20028
4 20016
5
Auctioning Entry into Tournaments
199958
6 1999310
7 199929

About Richard L. Fullerton

Richard L. Fullerton is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing and Safety Research, having authored 7 papers that have together received 755 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auction Theory and Applications (4 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (3 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), School Choice and Performance (2 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (2 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (1 paper) and Public Procurement and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (304 citations), General Decision Sciences (39 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (256 citations). Richard L. Fullerton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Preston McAfee, Scott Carrell, James E. West, Bruce G. Linster, Michael McKee and Martin McKee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Political Economy, The RAND Journal of Economics and Journal of Labor Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026