Rian Mehta

582 total citations
44 papers, 439 citations indexed

About

Rian Mehta is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Rian Mehta has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 439 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Social Psychology, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 10 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in Rian Mehta's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (16 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers) and Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (7 papers). Rian Mehta is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (16 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers) and Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (7 papers). Rian Mehta collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and South Korea. Rian Mehta's co-authors include Stephen Rice, Scott R. Winter, E. Rathakrishnan, Joseph R. Keebler, Mattie N. Milner, Emily C. Anania, John M. Robbins, Lisa A. Steelman, John E. Deaton and Hyung Kyung Kim and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Laboratory Investigation and Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

In The Last Decade

Rian Mehta

41 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rian Mehta United States	11	230	96	86	83	70	44	439
Emily C. Anania United States	9	128 0.6×	37 0.4×	39 0.5×	48 0.6×	105 1.5×	30	311
Hinnerk Eißfeldt Germany	10	88 0.4×	43 0.4×	96 1.1×	16 0.2×	43 0.6×	45	244
Giancarlos Parady Japan	11	26 0.1×	15 0.2×	6 0.1×	105 1.3×	93 1.3×	35	555
Basil Schmid Switzerland	13	16 0.1×	29 0.3×	19 0.2×	54 0.7×	186 2.7×	42	572
Merle Blok Netherlands	7	226 1.0×	18 0.2×	6 0.1×	31 0.4×	21 0.3×	11	351
Michael Maness United States	10	23 0.1×	5 0.1×	13 0.2×	50 0.6×	77 1.1×	24	368
Zhenjun Zhu China	12	46 0.2×	23 0.2×	3 0.0×	79 1.0×	62 0.9×	45	487
Sonali Nandavar Australia	6	103 0.4×	6 0.1×	2 0.0×	76 0.9×	53 0.8×	9	296
Farzana Rahman Bangladesh	15	28 0.1×	5 0.1×	6 0.1×	91 1.1×	52 0.7×	57	602
Matthew Clarke United States	12	13 0.1×	10 0.1×	79 0.9×	50 0.6×	54 0.8×	41	327

Countries citing papers authored by Rian Mehta

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rian Mehta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rian Mehta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rian Mehta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rian Mehta

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rian Mehta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rian Mehta. The network helps show where Rian Mehta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rian Mehta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rian Mehta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rian Mehta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rian Mehta. Rian Mehta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kim, Hyung Kyung, et al.. (2025). 353 AI-Assisted Cervical Cytology Screening Can Significantly Increase the Diagnostic Accuracy by Minimizing Major Discrepancy With Reduced Interpretation Time: A Retrospective Comparative Validation Study. Laboratory Investigation. 105(3). 102580–102580. 1 indexed citations

Mehta, Rian. (2023). Thermal Analysis of a Micro-Satellite in a Low Earth Orbit. Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies. 333–339.

Mehta, Rian, et al.. (2021). Are passengers willing to ride on autonomous cruise-ships?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 100014–100014. 5 indexed citations

Milner, Mattie N., et al.. (2021). Factors Predicting Patients’ Willingness to Use Robotic Dental Services. International Journal of Social Robotics. 13(7). 1803–1821. 3 indexed citations

Winter, Scott R., et al.. (2020). Safety systems, culture, and willingness to fly in autonomous air taxis: A multi-study and mediation analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management. 91. 101975–101975. 17 indexed citations

Mehta, Rian. (2020). Self-Assessment Data May Be Significantly Skewed During Global Health Crises. 12(1). 1 indexed citations

Mehta, Rian, et al.. (2019). Does a SWT Reverse Contagion Effect Exist from Humans to Automation?. Collegiate Aviation Review International. 37(1). 90–106. 7 indexed citations

Rice, Stephen, Scott R. Winter, Rian Mehta, et al.. (2018). Does length of ride, gender, or nationality affect willingness to ride in a driverless ambulance?. TSpace. 7(1). 39–53. 3 indexed citations

Mehta, Rian. (2017). Analysis of payload compartment venting of satellite launch vehicle. 4(4). 437. 3 indexed citations

10.

Winter, Scott R., et al.. (2017). Perceptions Toward the Federal Flight Deck Officer Program and Willingness to Fly. 7(1). 7–17. 6 indexed citations

11.

Mehta, Rian, et al.. (2017). Perceptions of Cockpit Configurations: A Culture and Gender Analysis. 27(1-2). 57–63. 21 indexed citations

12.

Mehta, Rian, et al.. (2016). Consumer Perception of Controlled Rest in Position. Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University). 1 indexed citations

13.

Winter, Scott R., et al.. (2015). Consumer Trust Ratings After an Airline Accident: an Affective Perspective. Journal of Bioresource Management. 284. 1 indexed citations

14.

Rice, Stephen, et al.. (2015). Which Emotion(s) Mediate the Relationship Between Mental Illness and Trust?. 3(2). 132–132. 6 indexed citations

15.

Winter, Scott R., Stephen Rice, & Rian Mehta. (2014). Aviation Consumers’ Trust in Pilots: A Cognitive or Emotional Function. International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace. 26 indexed citations

16.

Rice, Stephen, Rian Mehta, Lisa A. Steelman, & Scott R. Winter. (2014). A Trustworthiness of Commercial Airline Pilots (T-CAP) Scale for Indian Consumers. International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace. 1(3). 6 indexed citations

17.

Winter, Scott R., et al.. (2014). Consumer Perceptions of Starting Regional Pilot Pay Given Additional Qualifications. International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace. 1(2). 5 indexed citations

18.

Rice, Stephen, et al.. (2014). Time Pressure Has Limited Benefits for Human-Automation Performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 58(1). 1043–1046. 4 indexed citations

19.

Rice, Stephen, et al.. (2014). Passengers from India and the United States Have Differential Opinions about Autonomous Auto-Pilots for Commercial Flights. International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace. 44 indexed citations

20.

Winter, Scott R., et al.. (2014). Indian and American consumer perceptions of cockpit configuration policy. Journal of Air Transport Management. 42. 226–231. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact