Countries citing papers authored by Hinnerk Eißfeldt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hinnerk Eißfeldt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hinnerk Eißfeldt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hinnerk Eißfeldt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hinnerk Eißfeldt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hinnerk Eißfeldt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hinnerk Eißfeldt. The network helps show where Hinnerk Eißfeldt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hinnerk Eißfeldt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hinnerk Eißfeldt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hinnerk Eißfeldt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hinnerk Eißfeldt. Hinnerk Eißfeldt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk, et al.. (2017). On the Development of the Eye Movement Conflict Detection Test. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
7.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk, et al.. (2013). Aviator II Simulator-based Research on Operational Monitoring and Decision Making for Human Operators in Future Aviation. elib (German Aerospace Center).2 indexed citations
8.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk, et al.. (2013). Using eye tracking to describe monitoring behaviour during a passive and an active control task. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
9.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk, et al.. (2013). Validity report: DLR selection of ab initio air traffic controllers for DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH. elib (German Aerospace Center).2 indexed citations
10.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk, et al.. (2011). Selection Requirements to Work in Future ATM Systems. Journal of Bioresource Management. 315.3 indexed citations
11.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk, et al.. (2011). A Large Scale Validation Study on Air Traffic Controller Selection and Training-Design, Challenges and Results. Journal of Bioresource Management. 375.1 indexed citations
12.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk. (2010). Not quite the same: Findings about ability requirements for aviators in future ATM systems. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
13.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk. (2009). Aviator 2030 - Ability Requirements in Future ATM Systems. Journal of Bioresource Management. 112.2 indexed citations
14.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk. (2009). 'ICAO Level 4' - The Assessement of English Language Proficiency among Ab-Initio Applicants. elib (German Aerospace Center).
15.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk, et al.. (2008). When pilots and air traffic controllers discuss their future. elib (German Aerospace Center).10 indexed citations
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk, et al.. (1994). Effektives Arbeiten im Team: Crew Resource Management für Piloten und Fluglotsen. elib (German Aerospace Center).3 indexed citations
20.
Eißfeldt, Hinnerk, et al.. (1990). Sex Differences Concerning Performance and Personality Traits of Applicants for Highly Qualified Operator Functions in Aviation.. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.