Rebecca Graber

850 total citations
29 papers, 559 citations indexed

About

Rebecca Graber is a scholar working on Education, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebecca Graber has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 559 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Education, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 9 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Rebecca Graber's work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers). Rebecca Graber is often cited by papers focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers). Rebecca Graber collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Rebecca Graber's co-authors include Mike Sharples, Anna Madill, Martin Oliver, Rhiannon N. Turner, Wilma Clark, Rosemary Luckin, Adrian Mee, C. Keith Harrison, Declan Conway and Abbie Clare and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Global Environmental Change and Health Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Rebecca Graber

26 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rebecca Graber United Kingdom 12 225 216 108 95 70 29 559
Scott L. Walker United States 10 278 1.2× 87 0.4× 69 0.6× 53 0.6× 67 1.0× 29 708
Tatiana Begotti Italy 11 139 0.6× 254 1.2× 173 1.6× 45 0.5× 162 2.3× 24 503
Raquel Suriá Martínez Spain 13 181 0.8× 160 0.7× 149 1.4× 51 0.5× 172 2.5× 124 588
Cynthia Perez McCluskey United States 9 106 0.5× 258 1.2× 140 1.3× 64 0.7× 78 1.1× 11 433
Ashley N. Doane United States 9 111 0.5× 221 1.0× 138 1.3× 28 0.3× 328 4.7× 10 581
Maithreyi Gopalan United States 8 366 1.6× 135 0.6× 181 1.7× 51 0.5× 185 2.6× 20 757
Natascha de Hoog Netherlands 10 58 0.3× 270 1.3× 109 1.0× 24 0.3× 139 2.0× 16 647
M. Loreto Martínez Chile 11 165 0.7× 145 0.7× 238 2.2× 15 0.2× 180 2.6× 32 511
Gina Wong‐Wylie Canada 5 88 0.4× 158 0.7× 92 0.9× 14 0.1× 89 1.3× 9 487
Michael L. Frank United States 15 133 0.6× 224 1.0× 487 4.5× 9 0.1× 120 1.7× 37 940

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Graber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Graber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Graber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Graber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Graber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Graber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Graber. The network helps show where Rebecca Graber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Graber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Graber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Graber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Graber. Rebecca Graber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Graber, Rebecca, et al.. (2024). Young Adult Resilience for Recovery From Substance Addiction in Assam, India: Lived Experience Insights From a Photo‐Led Interview Study. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 35(1). e70022–e70022.
2.
Hugh‐Jones, Siobhan, et al.. (2024). What Protects At-Risk Young People in India From Using and Abusing Substances? A Photo-Led Study of Lived Experience. Journal of Adolescent Research. 41(1). 77–121. 2 indexed citations
3.
Madill, Anna, Poornima Bhola, Erminia Colucci, et al.. (2022). How can we mainstream mental health in research engaging the range of Sustainable Development Goals? A theory of change. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(8). e0000837–e0000837. 1 indexed citations
4.
Madill, Anna, et al.. (2022). Pathways to recovery model of youth substance misuse in Assam, India. Health Expectations. 26(1). 318–328. 7 indexed citations
5.
Visser, Richard de, Rebecca Graber, Charles Abraham, Angie Hart, & Anjum Memon. (2020). Resilience-based alcohol education: developing an intervention, evaluating feasibility and barriers to implementation using mixed-methods. Health Education Research. 35(2). 123–133. 4 indexed citations
6.
Graber, Rebecca, et al.. (2020). A death in the family: Citizens' experiences of changing healthcare commissioning practices in South East England. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 30(6). 603–615. 1 indexed citations
7.
Walker, Carl, et al.. (2018). Building spaces for controversial public engagement – Exploring and challenging democratic deficits in NHS marketization. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 6(2). 759–775. 4 indexed citations
8.
Clare, Abbie, Rebecca Graber, Lindsey Jones, & Declan Conway. (2017). Subjective measures of climate resilience: What is the added value for policy and programming?. Global Environmental Change. 46. 17–22. 59 indexed citations
9.
Graber, Rebecca, et al.. (2016). Social support and older adult falls. Injury Epidemiology. 3(1). 4–4. 11 indexed citations
11.
Graber, Rebecca, Richard de Visser, Charles Abraham, et al.. (2015). Staying in the ‘sweet spot’: A resilience-based analysis of the lived experience of low-risk drinking and abstention among British youth. Psychology and Health. 31(1). 79–99. 29 indexed citations
12.
Visser, Richard de, et al.. (2014). How alike are young non-drinkers, former-drinkers, low-risk drinkers, and hazardous drinkers?. Addictive Behaviors. 39(8). 1258–1264. 11 indexed citations
13.
Visser, Richard de, et al.. (2014). Which alcohol control strategies do young people think are effective?. Drug and Alcohol Review. 33(2). 144–151. 9 indexed citations
14.
Graber, Rebecca. (2011). Dialogical Self Theory: Positioning and Counter-Positioning in a Globalising Society. 13(1). 28–30. 2 indexed citations
15.
Tweed, Alison, et al.. (2010). Assessing Trainee Clinical Psychologists' Clinical Competence. Psychology Learning & Teaching. 9(2). 50–60. 13 indexed citations
16.
Sharples, Mike, et al.. (2009). E‐safety and Web 2.0 for children aged 11–16. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 25(1). 70–84. 84 indexed citations
17.
Luckin, Rosemary, et al.. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning at KS3 and KS4: Learners' use of Web 2.0 technologies in and out of school. 5 indexed citations
18.
Luckin, Rosemary, et al.. (2008). Learners' use of Web 2.0 technologies in and out of school in Key Stages 3 and 4. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 22 indexed citations
19.
Sharples, Mike, et al.. (2008). E-safety and Web 2.0: Web 2.0 technologies for learning at Key Stages 3 and 4. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 5 indexed citations
20.
Luckin, Rose, et al.. (2008). KS3 and KS4 learners' use of Web 2.0 technologies in and out of school - summary. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026