Rachel Murphy

1.8k citations
26 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Rachel Murphy

25 papers receiving 953 citations

Peers

Rachel Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Gender Studies 191
  • Political Science and International Relations 426
  • Demography 201
  • Safety Research 143
  • Sociology and Political Science 739
Replace Philip Verwimp with:
Philip Verwimp Belgium
Bruce Bradbury Australia
Farzana Afridi India
Patrícia Justino United Kingdom
Mary M. Kritz United States
Rachel Connelly United States
Caroline Krafft United States
Peter Jensen Denmark
Guido Heineck Germany
Rachel Murphy relative to Philip Verwimp Belgium Philip Verwimp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Philip Verwimp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Murphy. The network helps show where Rachel Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Rachel Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Rachel Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002184
2 2004165
3 2011142
4 2014138
5 199962
6
Chinese Citizenship: Views from the Margins
200552
7 200049
8 201441
9 201538
10 200936
11 200334
12 200921
13 200621
14 200917
15 200015
16 201415
17 202211
18 20067
19 20216
20 20254

About Rachel Murphy

Rachel Murphy is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Demography, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Safety Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (13 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (10 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (6 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (3 papers), Rural development and sustainability (3 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (191 citations), Political Science and International Relations (426 citations), Demography (201 citations), Safety Research (143 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (739 citations). Rachel Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ran Tao, Vanessa L. Fong, Ran Tao, Mingxing Liu, Wang Juan, David Johnson, Ran Tao, Xuehui An, Loretta Baldassar and Owen Conlan. Their work appears in journals such as The China Quarterly, Population and Development Review, Journal of International Development, International Journal of Educational Development and Development and Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact