Development and Change
About
In The Last Decade
Development and Change
1.9k papers receiving 50.9k citations
Fields of papers published in Development and Change
This network shows the impact of papers published in Development and Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Development and Change.
Countries where authors publish in Development and Change
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Development and Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Development and Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development and Change more than expected).
- Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment (1999)
- The World City Hypothesis (1986)
- Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge (1995)
- Twilight Institutions: Public Authority and Local Politics in Africa (2006)
- Access and Property: A Question of Power and Authority (2009)
- Community Driven Development, Collective Action and Elite Capture in Indonesia (2007)
- ‘The Law is to Blame’: The Vulnerable Status of Common Property Rights in Sub‐Saharan Africa (2011)
- Reflections on Latin American Rural Studies in the Neoliberal Globalization Period: A New Rurality? (2008)
- NGOs, Civil Society, and the State in Bangladesh: The Politics of Representing the Poor (1999)
- Non‐governmental Organizations in Africa: Can They Influence Public Policy? (1990)
- The Arab Spring and its Surprises (2013)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.