Political Science and International Relations15.2k
Economics and Econometrics12.3k
Global and Planetary Change9.9k
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences8.6k
Replace Population and Development Review with:
Population and Development ReviewUnited States
Economic Development and Cultural ChangeUnited States
Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersUnited Kingdom
Journal of International DevelopmentUnited Kingdom
Progress in Human GeographyUnited Kingdom
The Journal of Peasant StudiesUnited States
The World Bank Economic ReviewUnited States
China Economic ReviewChina
AntipodeUnited States
Political GeographyUnited Kingdom
Population and Development ReviewUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Development and Change
Development and Change · 1×
×2.780.1kSPS
×1.116.7kPSIR
×2.327.8kEE
×0.77.1kGPC
×0.54.6kGABS
Citations per year, relative to Development and Change
Development and Change · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Development and Change
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Development and Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Development and Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development and Change more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Development and Change
This network shows the impact of papers published in Development and Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Development and Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.