Population and Development Review

3.2k papers and 166.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Population and Development Review in the last decades have received a total of 166.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Population and Development Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (841 papers), Gender Studies (741 papers) and Demography (672 papers) specifically the topics of Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (532 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (345 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (308 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Population and Development Review are John Bongaarts, Susan Greenhalgh, R. Eric Heidel, John C. Caldwell, Geoffrey McNicoll, Michael P. Todaro, Martin Brockerhoff, Ronny Lesthaeghe, Samuel H. Preston and Garrett Hardin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Population and Development Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Population and Development Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Population and Development Review.

Countries where authors publish in Population and Development Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Population and Development Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Population and Development Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Population and Development Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025