R. Mark Mathews

2.4k citations
69 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 22

R. Mark Mathews

69 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

R. Mark Mathews
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • General Health Professions 532
  • Demography 400
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 333
  • Sociology and Political Science 316
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 301
Replace Tom Kitwood with:
Tom Kitwood United Kingdom
James W. Grosch United States
Dawn Carr United States
Jennifer A. Margrett United States
Anthea Innes United Kingdom
Elizabeth Ozanne Australia
Anita M. Hubley Canada
Dieter Ferring Luxembourg
Rocío Fernández Ballesteros Spain
Stacey Wood United States
R. Mark Mathews relative to Tom Kitwood United Kingdom Tom Kitwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Tom Kitwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Mark Mathews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Mark Mathews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Mark Mathews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Mark Mathews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Mark Mathews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Mark Mathews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Mark Mathews. The network helps show where R. Mark Mathews may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Mark Mathews

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Mark Mathews. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Mark Mathews based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Mark Mathews. R. Mark Mathews is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 16
2 92
3 40
4 18
5 284
6 37
7 35
8 69
9 50
10 10
11 2
12 2
13 17
14 28
15 111
16
Using a Slide Presentation to Change Attitudes toward People with Disabilities and Knowledge of Independent Living Services.
7
17 6
18
Peer Counseling: Consumer Involvement in Independent Living Programs.
2
19
Development and Validation of an Occupational Skills Assessment Instrument
18
20 78

About R. Mark Mathews

R. Mark Mathews is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Demography and Occupational Therapy, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (23 papers), Community Health and Development (12 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (119 citations), Demography (400 citations) and Health (219 citations). R. Mark Mathews has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Stephen B. Fawcett, Ernesto Pollitt, Ian Hughes, Shima Sum, Deborah E. Altus, Andrew Campbell, Kimberly K. Engelman, Tom Seekins, Ralph Fletcher and Karl Kosloski. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, American Journal of Community Psychology and Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026