Anthea Innes

3.9k citations
113 papers · 2.7k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Anthea Innes

104 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Anthea Innes
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 798
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 72
  • General Health Professions 896
  • Demography 298
  • Health 152
Replace Brian Carpenter with:
Brian Carpenter United States
Tom Kitwood United Kingdom
Elizabeth Hanson Sweden
R. Mark Mathews United States
Lennart Nordenfelt Sweden
Michelle H. Lim Australia
Sarah Campbell United Kingdom
Gloria Hoi Yan Wong Hong Kong
Viviana M. Wuthrich Australia
Tengku Aizan Hamid Malaysia
Anthea Innes relative to Brian Carpenter United States Brian Carpenter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Brian Carpenter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anthea Innes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthea Innes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthea Innes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthea Innes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthea Innes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthea Innes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthea Innes. The network helps show where Anthea Innes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anthea Innes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anthea Innes Line = papers co-authored together Anthea Innes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017227
2 2010185
3 2009112
4 2010110
5 201590
6 201287
7 201067
8 201265
9 201661
10 201760
11
Dementia and social inclusion : marginalised groups and marginalised areas of dementia research, care and practice
200457
12 201153
13 200553
14 201252
15 201449
16 201649
17 201248
18 201547
19 201745
20 200545

About Anthea Innes

Anthea Innes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science, Demography and Education, having authored 113 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (34 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (21 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (14 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (12 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (12 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (7 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (7 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (798 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (72 citations), General Health Professions (896 citations), Demography (298 citations) and Health (152 citations). Anthea Innes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Fiona Kelly, Charles Scerri, David Edvardsson, Debra Morgan, Louise McCabe, Anthony Scerri, Stephen J. Page, Anne Mason, Jan Wiener and Julie Kosteniuk. Their work appears in journals such as Dementia, Health & Social Care in the Community, Aging & Mental Health, Maturitas and Ageing and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact