Priya Deshmukh-Taskar
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 1%
- Physiology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Theresa A. NicklasJohn D. RadcliffeCarol E. O’NeilGerald S. BerensonSusan ChoDebra R. KeastSu-Jau YangIssa Zakeri
- Topics
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers)Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers)Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers)
- Journals
- Archives of Biochemistry and BiophysicsEuropean Journal of Clinical NutritionPublic Health Nutrition
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Priya Deshmukh-Taskar
9 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.0k
- Physiology 416
- General Health Professions 231
- Nutrition and Dietetics 218
- Clinical Psychology 166
Countries citing papers authored by Priya Deshmukh-Taskar
This map shows the geographic impact of Priya Deshmukh-Taskar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Priya Deshmukh-Taskar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Priya Deshmukh-Taskar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Priya Deshmukh-Taskar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Priya Deshmukh-Taskar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Priya Deshmukh-Taskar. The network helps show where Priya Deshmukh-Taskar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Priya Deshmukh-Taskar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Priya Deshmukh-Taskar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Priya Deshmukh-Taskar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Priya Deshmukh-Taskar. Priya Deshmukh-Taskar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 240 | |
| 2 | 168 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | The Relationship of Breakfast Skipping and Type of Breakfast Consumption with Nutrient Intake and Weight Status in Children and Adolescents: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2006breakdown → | 396 |
| 5 | 119 | |
| 6 | 128 | |
| 7 | 132 | |
| 8 | 282 | |
| 9 | 1 |
About Priya Deshmukh-Taskar
Priya Deshmukh-Taskar is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and General Health Professions, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.0k citations), Physiology (416 citations) and Pharmacy (72 citations). Priya Deshmukh-Taskar has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Theresa A. Nicklas, John D. Radcliffe, Carol E. O’Neil, Gerald S. Berenson, Susan Cho, Debra R. Keast, Su-Jau Yang, Issa Zakeri, Subash C. Gupta and Sahdeo Prasad. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Public Health Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.