Phyllis Rackin

947 citations
24 papers · 267 indexed · h-index 8

Phyllis Rackin

19 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers

Phyllis Rackin
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Literature and Literary Theory 179
  • Museology 24
  • Anthropology 64
  • History 67
  • Classics 23
Replace Michael Neill with:
Michael Neill New Zealand
David Scott Kastan United Kingdom
Graham Holderness United Kingdom
Leah S. Marcus United States
Hugh Grady United States
Dorothea Kehler United States
Linda Woodbridge Canada
Raymond B. Waddington United States
Michael Gamer United States
Daniel Javitch United States
Phyllis Rackin relative to Michael Neill New Zealand Michael Neill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Michael Neill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phyllis Rackin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phyllis Rackin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phyllis Rackin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phyllis Rackin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phyllis Rackin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phyllis Rackin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phyllis Rackin. The network helps show where Phyllis Rackin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Phyllis Rackin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phyllis Rackin Line = papers co-authored together Phyllis Rackin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Close Reading Shakespeare: An Introduction
20171
2
Shakespeare and Women
20059
3 200214
4 20001
5 19991
6
Engendering a Nation: A Feminist Account of Shakespeare's English Histories
199745
7
Engendering the tragic audience: the case of Richard III
19933
8 19930
9 19915
10
Stages of History
19907
11 199091
12 198734
13 19874
14 19866
15 198511
16 19833
17
Shakespeare's Tragedies
19781
18 19727
19 19700
20 19671

About Phyllis Rackin

Phyllis Rackin is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, History, Museology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 24 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (10 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (1 paper), Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper) and Travel Writing and Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (179 citations), Museology (24 citations), Anthropology (64 citations), History (67 citations) and Classics (23 citations). Phyllis Rackin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jean E. Howard, Michael D. Bristol, Diane E. Dreher, Peter Erickson, James C. Bulman, David Μ. Bergeron, Pamela Mason, Robert S Miola, R. A. Foakes and Ronald Knowles. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, Theatre Journal, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and Sixteenth Century Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026