Daniel Javitch
- Classics top 1%
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 11
-
- Early Modern Spanish Literature 6
- Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism 3
- Historical and Literary Analyses 2
- History top 1%
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 13
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
- General Arts and Humanities top 2%
- Italian Literature and Culture 4
-
- Historical Art and Culture Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas M. GreeneJohn StevensΑ. Owen AldridgeRoland GreeneMario J. ValdésChristopher BraiderRichard WaswoFrançois Rigolot
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Javitch
24 papers receiving 145 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Classics 100
- Literature and Literary Theory 137
- History 123
- General Arts and Humanities 9
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 26
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Javitch
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Javitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Javitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Javitch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Javitch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Javitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Javitch. The network helps show where Daniel Javitch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Javitch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 4 | Lo spettro del romanzo nella teoria sull'epica del seidicesimo secolo | 2003 | 1 |
| 5 | The book of the courtier : the Singleton translation : an authoritative text criticism | 2002 | 4 |
| 6 | Renaissance Philosophy and Book IV of Il Cortegiano | 2002 | 1 |
| 7 | Ariosto classico : la canonizzazione dell'Orlando furioso | 1999 | 0 |
| 8 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 10 | Comparative literary history as discourse : in honor of Anna Balakian | 1992 | 2 |
| 11 | 1991 | 28 | |
| 12 | Proclaiming a classic | 1991 | 0 |
| 13 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1980 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1979 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 4 |
About Daniel Javitch
Daniel Javitch is a scholar working on Classics, General Arts and Humanities, History, Literature and Literary Theory and Museology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (13 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (11 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (6 papers), Italian Literature and Culture (4 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (100 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (137 citations), History (123 citations), General Arts and Humanities (9 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (26 citations). Daniel Javitch has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Greene, John Stevens, Α. Owen Aldridge, Roland Greene, Mario J. Valdés, Christopher Braider, Richard Waswo, François Rigolot, Ullrich Langer and William J. Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as MLN, Comparative Literature, Modern Language Quarterly, Renaissance Quarterly and Renaissance Drama.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.