Phillip Williams

22 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Phillip Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Education 180
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 115
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 110
  • Social Psychology 53
  • General Health Professions 49
Replace Kay Colthorpe with:
Kay Colthorpe Australia
Stephan Dutke Germany
Sonia Saddiqui Australia
Mary K. Enright United States
Guus Smeets Netherlands
John P. Poggio United States
Arshya Vahabzadeh United States
Sune Vork Steffensen Denmark
Brady Butterfield United States
Joost Meijer Netherlands
Phillip Williams relative to Kay Colthorpe Australia Kay Colthorpe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Kay Colthorpe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Williams. The network helps show where Phillip Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip Williams. Phillip Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 3
3
Resultant and conductor of geometrically semi-stable self maps of the projective line over a function field
2
4
Teacher education and professional development
2
5
Digital democracy - a new role for technology education
2
6
Crises in Technology Education in Australia
2
7 57
8 9
9 2
10 1
11 13
12
The Special Education Handbook: An Introductory Reference
1
13
Special education in minority communities
7
14
Deprivation and the infant school : a report of the work of the Schools Council Research and Development Project in Compensatory Education
1
15 331
16
Behaviour problems in school;: A source book of readings
1
17 28
18 3
19 1
20 28

About Phillip Williams

Phillip Williams is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Behavioral Neuroscience and Education, having authored 25 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Health and Nursing Education (3 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (45 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (45 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (110 citations). Phillip Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Neil Ferguson, P. T. Davies, Lori L. Davis, Frederick Petty, Gerald L. Kramer, Roy Evans, Neil M. Ferguson, Ronald C. Plotnikoff, Allan Fein and Jane Potter. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026