Phillip L. Carter

1.1k total citations
23 papers, 849 citations indexed

About

Phillip L. Carter is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Phillip L. Carter has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 849 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Management Information Systems, 5 papers in Strategy and Management and 5 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. Recurrent topics in Phillip L. Carter's work include Quality and Supply Management (7 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (6 papers) and Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (3 papers). Phillip L. Carter is often cited by papers focused on Quality and Supply Management (7 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (6 papers) and Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (3 papers). Phillip L. Carter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Latvia. Phillip L. Carter's co-authors include Joseph R. Carter, Stephen N. Chapman, Craig R. Carter, Robert M. Monczka, Kevin Dooley, Arash Azadegan, Robert H. Smith, Kenneth J. Petersen, Jeffrey A. Ogden and Lutz Kaufmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Management Science, International Journal of Production Research and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

Phillip L. Carter

23 papers receiving 756 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Phillip L. Carter United States 12 487 483 286 106 89 23 849
Satish Mehra United States 18 712 1.5× 568 1.2× 213 0.7× 73 0.7× 107 1.2× 34 988
M. Hossein Safizadeh United States 13 392 0.8× 363 0.8× 174 0.6× 94 0.9× 87 1.0× 22 786
Chee‐Chuong Sum Singapore 13 502 1.0× 334 0.7× 144 0.5× 69 0.7× 168 1.9× 17 792
Laura B. Forker United States 11 656 1.3× 585 1.2× 225 0.8× 79 0.7× 34 0.4× 16 987
Colin New United Kingdom 12 495 1.0× 373 0.8× 145 0.5× 112 1.1× 118 1.3× 23 771
Dennis Kehoe United Kingdom 18 766 1.6× 573 1.2× 163 0.6× 66 0.6× 120 1.3× 47 1.1k
Emilio Bartezzaghi Italy 16 402 0.8× 344 0.7× 222 0.8× 57 0.5× 167 1.9× 41 810
Karl Manrodt United States 16 426 0.9× 319 0.7× 292 1.0× 126 1.2× 54 0.6× 44 849
Chan K. Hahn United States 12 923 1.9× 722 1.5× 183 0.6× 88 0.8× 130 1.5× 24 1.2k
Lawrence M. Corbett New Zealand 17 630 1.3× 653 1.4× 161 0.6× 152 1.4× 61 0.7× 19 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip L. Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip L. Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip L. Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip L. Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip L. Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip L. Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip L. Carter. The network helps show where Phillip L. Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip L. Carter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip L. Carter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip L. Carter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip L. Carter. Phillip L. Carter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Carter, Joseph R., Phillip L. Carter, & Robert M. Monczka. (2009). Supply management strategies for turbulent times. Supply chain management review. 13(7). 3 indexed citations
2.
Azadegan, Arash, Kevin Dooley, Phillip L. Carter, & Joseph R. Carter. (2008). SUPPLIER INNOVATIVENESS AND THE ROLE OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN ENHANCING MANUFACTURER CAPABILITIES. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 44(4). 14–35. 133 indexed citations
3.
Ogden, Jeffrey A. & Phillip L. Carter. (2008). The supply base reduction process: an empirical investigation. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 19(1). 5–28. 27 indexed citations
4.
Petersen, Kenneth J., Jeffrey A. Ogden, & Phillip L. Carter. (2007). B2B e‐marketplaces: a typology by functionality. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 37(1). 4–18. 35 indexed citations
5.
Carter, Phillip L., et al.. (2000). The Future of Purchasing and Supply: A Ten‐Year Forecast1. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 36(4). 14–26. 127 indexed citations
6.
Hershauer, James C., et al.. (1997). The Role of Organizational and Interorganizational Factors on Planned Adoption of Electronic Commerce. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations
7.
Ho, Chrwan‐Jyh & Phillip L. Carter. (1994). Adopting Rescheduling Capability in DRP to Deal with Operational Uncertainty in Logistics Systems. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 5(1). 33–42. 6 indexed citations
8.
Ho, Chrwan‐Jyh, et al.. (1992). Research Framework for Investigating the Effectiveness ofDampening Procedures to Cope with MRP System Nervousness. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 12(6). 30–43. 10 indexed citations
9.
Chapman, Stephen N. & Phillip L. Carter. (1990). Supplier/Customer Inventory Relationships Under Just In Time. Decision Sciences. 21(1). 35–51. 113 indexed citations
10.
Ho, Chrwan‐Jyh & Phillip L. Carter. (1988). Using Vendor Capacity Planning In Supplier Evaluation. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. 24(1). 23–30. 11 indexed citations
11.
Melnyk, Steven A., et al.. (1987). Production activity control : a practical guide. 11 indexed citations
12.
Melnyk, Steven A. & Phillip L. Carter. (1987). Shop floor control principles and practices and case studies. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 6 indexed citations
13.
Melnyk, Steven A., Shawnee K. Vickery, & Phillip L. Carter. (1986). Scheduling, sequencing, and dispatching: Alternative perspectives. 27(2). 58–68. 28 indexed citations
14.
Bowersox, Donald J., Phillip L. Carter, & Robert M. Monczka. (1985). Materials Logistics Management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management. 15(5). 27–35. 30 indexed citations
15.
Carter, Phillip L. & Robert M. Monczka. (1978). MRO Inventory Pooling. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. 14(3). 27–33. 4 indexed citations
16.
Carter, Phillip L., et al.. (1978). Production scheduling decision rules in changing and non-linear environments. International Journal of Production Research. 16(6). 493–496. 3 indexed citations
17.
Hamner, W. Clay & Phillip L. Carter. (1975). A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT COEFFICIENT DECISION RULES. Decision Sciences. 6(2). 324–336. 11 indexed citations
18.
Carter, Phillip L.. (1974). A Bayesian Approach to Controlling Percent Defective A Model and Application. A I I E Transactions. 6(3). 235–243. 1 indexed citations
19.
Carter, Phillip L.. (1972). A Bayesian Approach to Quality Control. Management Science. 18(11). 647–655. 24 indexed citations
20.
Carter, Phillip L.. (1970). A Bayesian decision theory approach to process control. University Microfilms eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026