Philipp Schäper

23 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Philipp Schäper
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Computer Science Applications 33
  • Human-Computer Interaction 33
  • Social Psychology 112
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 43
  • Artificial Intelligence 98
Replace Bruce Phillips with:
Bruce Phillips United States
Asad Sayeed Germany
Brooke White United States
Zike Cao China
Jyrki Suomala Finland
Xiao Wei China
Tatiana Lau United States
Soojin Jun South Korea
Lucas Whittaker Australia
Philipp Schäper relative to Bruce Phillips United States Bruce Phillips's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.7×
Bruce Phillips · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Schäper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Schäper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Schäper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Schäper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Schäper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Schäper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Schäper. The network helps show where Philipp Schäper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Schäper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Schäper Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Schäper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201670
2 202170
3 202030
4 202228
5 202112
6 202212
7 202112
8 201610
9 20219
10 20228
11 20197
12 20197
13 20216
14 20196
15 20175
16 20225
17 20224
18 20233
19 20213
20 20152

About Philipp Schäper

Philipp Schäper is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in Service Interactions (10 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (8 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (3 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (33 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (33 citations), Social Psychology (112 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (43 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (98 citations). Philipp Schäper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Birgit Lugrin, Martin Eling, Tobias Grundgeiger, Tanja Messingschlager, Jean-Luc Lugrin, Sebastian Oberdörfer, Marc Erich Latoschik, Klaus Weckbecker, Stephan Jonas and Jochen René Thyrian. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning and Interacting with Computers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact