Philipp Berghofer

453 citations
24 papers · 167 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Philipp Berghofer

22 papers receiving 157 citations

Peers

Philipp Berghofer
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • History and Philosophy of Science 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • Philosophy 71
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 30
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 17
Replace Nikk Effingham with:
Nikk Effingham United Kingdom
Giuliano Torrengo Italy
Nina Emery United States
Dan Marshall Hong Kong
Jiri Benovsky Switzerland
Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson Sweden
Cody Gilmore United States
Max Kistler France
Natalja Deng South Korea
Mark Povich United States
Philipp Berghofer relative to Nikk Effingham United Kingdom Nikk Effingham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Nikk Effingham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Berghofer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Berghofer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Berghofer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Berghofer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Berghofer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Berghofer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Berghofer. The network helps show where Philipp Berghofer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Berghofer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Berghofer Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Berghofer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201822
2 201816
3 201716
4 202015
5 202015
6 202010
7 20177
8 20187
9 20246
10 20186
11 20186
12 20226
13 20176
14 20205
15 20205
16 20194
17 20243
18 20223
19 20233
20 20182

About Philipp Berghofer

Philipp Berghofer is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 24 papers that have together received 167 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (9 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (3 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (78 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations), Philosophy (71 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (30 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (17 citations). Philipp Berghofer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include J François. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Husserl Studies, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics and Axiomathes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact