Nina Emery

447 citations
15 papers · 138 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Philosophy and History of Science
    • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory

Papers in

Nina Emery

14 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers

Nina Emery
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • History and Philosophy of Science 87
  • Philosophy 77
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 17
  • Theoretical Computer Science 1
Replace Philipp Berghofer with:
Philipp Berghofer Austria
Giuliano Torrengo Italy
Jeanne Peijnenburg Netherlands
Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson Sweden
Anna Marmodoro United Kingdom
Natalja Deng South Korea
Cody Gilmore United States
Hedda Hassel Mørch Norway
Nikk Effingham United Kingdom
Heather Dyke New Zealand
Nina Emery relative to Philipp Berghofer Austria Philipp Berghofer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Philipp Berghofer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Emery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Emery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Emery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Emery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Emery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Emery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Emery. The network helps show where Nina Emery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Nina Emery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Emery Line = papers co-authored together Nina Emery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201836
2 201324
3 201713
4 201712
5 20189
6 20239
7 20157
8 20176
9 20166
10 20186
11 20225
12 20233
13 20221
14 20201
15 20250

About Nina Emery

Nina Emery is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 138 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (1 paper) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (87 citations), Philosophy (77 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (17 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (1 citation). Nina Emery has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christopher S. Hill and Antoine Flahault. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Erkenntnis, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact