Nikk Effingham

499 citations
32 papers · 216 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Nikk Effingham

28 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

Nikk Effingham
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 94
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 147
  • Philosophy 127
  • Theoretical Computer Science 2
  • Religious studies 6
Replace Natalja Deng with:
Natalja Deng South Korea
Matjaž Potrč Slovenia
A. J. Cotnoir United Kingdom
Jiri Benovsky Switzerland
Timothy McGrew United States
L. Nathan Oaklander United States
Anna Marmodoro United Kingdom
Travis Dumsday Canada
Ricki Bliss United States
Joshua Hoffman United States
Nikk Effingham relative to Natalja Deng South Korea Natalja Deng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natalja Deng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nikk Effingham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikk Effingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikk Effingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikk Effingham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikk Effingham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikk Effingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikk Effingham. The network helps show where Nikk Effingham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Nikk Effingham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nikk Effingham Line = papers co-authored together Nikk Effingham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200740
2 200939
3 200925
4 202012
5 201512
6 20079
7
An Introduction to Ontology
20139
8 20158
9 20107
10 20106
11 20086
12 20214
13 20184
14 20184
15 20074
16 20104
17 20213
18 20203
19
Persistence, composition, and identity
20092
20 20132

About Nikk Effingham

Nikk Effingham is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (20 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (6 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (94 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (147 citations), Philosophy (127 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations) and Religious studies (6 citations). Nikk Effingham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jon Robson, Joseph Melia, Helen Beebee, Philip Goff, Malcolm J Price and Kristie Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Erkenntnis, Thought A Journal of Philosophy and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact