Natalja Deng
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Historical Philosophy and Science
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 11
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 6
- Philosophy and History of Science 5
- Co-authors
- Andrew J. Latham (1 shared paper)Kristie Miller (1 shared paper)Klaas Landsman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophia (3 papers)Inquiry (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Ratio (1 paper)The Southern Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Natalja Deng
17 papers receiving 172 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- History and Philosophy of Science 65
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 114
- Philosophy 92
- General Decision Sciences 4
- Cognitive Neuroscience 27
Countries citing papers authored by Natalja Deng
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalja Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalja Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalja Deng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalja Deng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalja Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalja Deng. The network helps show where Natalja Deng may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Natalja Deng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 12 | God and Time | 2018 | 4 |
| 13 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 18 | SEP Entry: Eternity in Christian Thought | 2018 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About Natalja Deng
Natalja Deng is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Social Psychology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (65 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (114 citations), Philosophy (92 citations), General Decision Sciences (4 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (27 citations). Natalja Deng has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller and Klaas Landsman. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophia, Inquiry, Philosophical Studies, Ratio and The Southern Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.