Husserl Studies

389 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 389 papers published in Husserl Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Husserl Studies usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (266 papers), Philosophy (233 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (45 papers) specifically the topics of Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (252 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (133 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Husserl Studies are Gail Soffer, Rees-Mogg William, John J. Drummond, Dan Zahavi, Shaun Gallagher, Anthony J. Steinbock, James G. Hart, Karl Schuhmann, Søren Overgaard and Dieter Lohmar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Husserl Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Husserl Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Husserl Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Husserl Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Husserl Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Husserl Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Husserl Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025